pm_901003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday October 3, 1990 Stokes questioned the pitched roof. Nelson stated that it would be constructed out of flat material with an asphalt mat. Stokes commented that it looked like a ski slope. Nelson stated that one side has a high hoist, but that the roof drains into the catch basins. Page 9 Stokes questioned whether there would be any storage between the existing building and the new roof. Nelson stated no, the roof trusses would take up all the room. Goedeke questioned whether there would be any equipment on the roof. Nelson stated no. Goedeke questioned whether there was any gutter. Nelson stated that yes there was with down spout draining water toward the catch basin. Goedeke questioned Keel if this was adequate. Keel answered that it was. Berry questioned the lighting. Nelson stated that the lighting will cover the east and south sides. The Public Hearing was closed. Stokes questioned the lighting plan. Shardlow stated that the plan was to fix the existing light fixtures. Goedeke questioned whether that was adequate. Jopke stated that the question is if the lights can be repaired to cover the lighting needs, this would be covered under the electrical permits. MOTION Wietecki moved and Roberts seconded to recommend that the special use permit be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the site be developed according to the plan submitted to the commission on October 3, 1990. 2. That a contribution be made to the pathway fund consistent with City policy. 3. That final landscape, drainage, and rental vehicle storage plan be approved by staff. Roll Call: Ayes: Berry, Goedeke, Johnson, Stokes Roberts, wietecki Nayes: None Planning File 2167 Thomas Willmus request for a special use permit for an amendment to a planned unit development.