pm_901107 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday November 7, 1990 Page 10 Shardlow stated that the city has the leverage to ask for conditions. Berry questioned whether it is possible to approve the request with the condition that the applicant come back with changes for the pylon sign. Shardlow stated no. Wietecki stated that if the applicant had stated that if the pylon signs would remain unchanged from the approved plan the Commission could approve the request. Ross asked whether they could proceed on the condition that the sign design remain the same as in the approved plan. DeBenedet stated that he would rather have the applicant work with staff on sign design and not negotiate on the spot. Shardlow stated that the plans don't include any sign design details. MOTION DeBenedet moved and Goedeke seconded to continue consideration of this matter until the December Commission meeting to allow the applicant an opportunity to work with staff to develop a comprehensive sign plan for the shopping center. Roll Call: Ayes: Berry, DeBenedet, Goedeke, Johnson, Roberts, Stokes, wietecki Nayes: None Planninq File 2179 John Palmer/South Oaks Partnership request for a variance at 1080 W. County Rd. D. Presentation Shardlow presented the request. Shardlow stated that variances were granted in 1971 for parking lot and garage setbacks. Shardlow pointed out that the existing rear setback of the apartment building is only 25 feet and needs a 5 foot variance. No hardship is present and if this site is ever redeveloped that variance would not transfer to the redevelopment. Palmer who represents the apartment management stated that the building was built in the 60's and his group bought it in 1978. They want to refinance the building and the bank found the discrepancy. Palmer stated that they were here to rectify a