My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_901205
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1990
>
pm_901205
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:33 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
12/5/1990
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />12 <br /> <br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Wednesday, December 5, 1990 <br /> <br />Planninq File 2193 <br /> <br />Pope Associates, Inc. request for a special use permit for motor <br />vehicle related use and division of platted lot at 2330 County <br />Road c. <br /> <br />Jopke pointed out that this application has been temporarily <br />withdrawn in order to resolve issues relating to the platting of <br />the property. <br /> <br />Other Business <br /> <br />Review of the 1991 through 1995 capital improvement program. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Shardlow summarized the role of the planning commission. <br /> <br />Roberts questioned how the Planning Commission should review the <br />document in light of the fact that the current comprehensive plan <br />is under review. Shardlow replied that the proposed capital <br />improvement program should be reviewed against the current <br />comprehensive plan. Once the comprehensive plan is reviewed, <br />any future capital improvement programs will be reviewed against <br />that document. <br /> <br />Burrell summarized what the capital improvement program is, the <br />process used to develop it and the items of significance to the <br />comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />Berry questioned whether park projects included the funds <br />received from park dedication. <br /> <br />Burrell responded that the plan does not include that as a <br />revenue source because it is difficult to determine how much it <br />will bring in. <br /> <br />Berry questioned what the pool repair proj ect was. <br />answered that it was repairs to the wading pool. <br /> <br />Burrell <br /> <br />stokes questioned if there was some language missing on page 6. <br />Burrell reviewed the language on page 6. <br /> <br />Stokes questioned why we were high compared to other cities. <br /> <br />Burrell pointed out that the tax increment financing is <br />proceeding well and there are no problems like are being <br />experienced in Minneapolis and st. Paul. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.