Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7 <br /> <br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Wednesday, December 5, 1990 <br /> <br />criteria at the present time. <br /> <br />Ross stated that he has made a commitment on the issues at hand <br />and does not understand why approval of the monument signs should <br />be held up. <br /> <br />Shardlow pointed out that all the issues have been discussed with <br />Mr. Ross and that he is committed to all the items he is willing <br />to at this point. Shardlow stated that it would be his <br />recommendation to move forward with the monument and pylon signs <br />with a commitment from the applicant to return when wall signage <br />criteria is developed. Shardlow stated that it should be clear <br />to the applicant what the City's expectations are. Shardlow <br />indicated that it was important to have some mechanism to bring <br />the whole Center under a uniform criteria. <br /> <br />Ross stated that he does not want to avoid issues and he is happy <br />to bring back a uniform criteria for the Center, but also wants <br />to move forward on the monument and pylon signs. <br /> <br />Shardlow testified that when the Center was originally approved <br />there was no requirement for uniform sign criteria. He pointed <br />out that now that the applicant is asking for a variance, the <br />City can require the criteria. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that it is not appropriate for the city to design <br />the criteria, but that the applicant should submit one for city <br />review. <br /> <br />Johnson closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Roberts stated that he felt it was appropriate to move ahead on <br />the monument and pylon signs, but to send Ross away with what he <br />should come back with. Roberts added that he should come back <br />with a criteria fairly soon so it can be incorporated into leases <br />as they come up. <br /> <br />Goedeke questioned whether the existing tenants have been <br />approached about the sign changes on the building. <br /> <br />Ross responded by saying that the pavilion signs would be very <br />desirable and in demand. Ross added that negotiations will <br />determine which tenants will stay and what signage is needed and <br />until that is known, he cannot present a specific sign plan. <br /> <br />Johnson pointed out that an approved plan could help these <br />negotiations by prescribing beforehand what signage is permitted. <br /> <br />Ross stated that the development of a specific criteria could be <br />