My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_901205
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1990
>
pm_901205
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:33 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
12/5/1990
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />8 <br /> <br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Wednesday, December 5, 1990 <br /> <br />addressed in shorter than 18 months. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned what would happen if the special use permit <br />was approved for the monument signs with the condition that <br />criteria be developed and then an impasse on development of the <br />criteria occurs. Would the signs then be removed? <br /> <br />Shardlow stated that the city could not go back and require the <br />removal of the signs, but he added that the sign ordinance is <br />under review and in all likelihood will require uniform criteria <br />for all multitenant centers. <br /> <br />Goedeke questioned whether existing signage at the Center would <br />be grand fathered in and not subject to the new requirements. <br /> <br />Shardlow stated that he did not feel they would be grand fathered <br />in. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned what a reasonable time frame might be. <br />Shardlow responded six months. <br /> <br />MOTION <br /> <br />Roberts moved to recommend approval, with the condition that a <br />full sign package be presented within six months. <br /> <br />DeBenedet <br />criteria. <br /> <br />asked if the motion would require a uniform sign <br />Roberts said it did not. <br /> <br />The motion died for lack of a second. <br /> <br />MOTION <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved and Berry seconded to recommend approval of <br />Tanurb Development's request for a special use permit for an <br />amended site plan and variance to allow construction of two <br />monument signs at the Rosedale Commons Shopping Center at 2480 <br />Fairview Avenue North, with the following conditions: <br />1. That the signs be designed and constructed according to the <br />plans and criteria submitted to the Planning Commission on <br />December 5, 1990. <br /> <br />2. That the applicant develop and present a complete uniform <br />sign criteria for the Shopping Center, including wall <br />signage, which includes letter style, color, font style, and <br />letter size to the Planning Commission and City Council <br />within six months. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.