Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Paget <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />April 10, 1991 <br /> <br />would get into the lake. <br /> <br />Goedeke asked if the applicant intended to move materials in and <br />out because he was concerned with a rodent problem if materials <br />were just left there. Shardlow responded that it was his <br />understanding that materials would be moved in and out but there <br />was no commitment on a time period. <br /> <br />stokes asked if we would be committed to a two year period and <br />what would happen if a better use comes along during that period. <br />Shardlow replied that the time frame is subject to the private <br />agreement between the property owner and NSP. <br /> <br />Harms questioned how much traffic would be going in and out and <br />if there would be a problem with ruts forming on the site. <br />Shardlow replied that this was the reason for paving to the <br />fence. <br /> <br />Harms stated her concern about the public going into the site. <br />Shardlow stated that he didn't anticipate there would be a <br />problem with ruts or that it would be that busy. <br /> <br />Harms questioned how would the site be available to the pUblic <br />and if there were any liability and safety issues. <br /> <br />Greg Grongess from Northern states Power Company explained that <br />this would be a transfer si te and not permanent storage of <br />materials. Grongress stated that there would be four crews using <br />the site and each crew would have approximately two to three <br />loads for a week. Grongress added that the material would be <br />hauled out on a weekly basis and would not involve high volumes <br />of materials. Grongress said that the gate would be locked and <br />that appointments would be made for citizens to come to the site. <br /> <br />Goedeke asked if there would be only wood chips and fire wood and <br />stated that there should be no rodent problem. <br /> <br />stokes asked if there would be any processing on the site. <br />Grongress stated that there would not and that the piles would <br />generally be only about 6 feet high because there would be no <br />machinery available at the site to pile it any higher. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked if the applicant understood the recommended <br />conditions. Grongress stated that he did. <br /> <br />DeBenedet closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />stokes stated that he was concerned about diseased elm materials <br />being stored on the site. Grongress replied that they do not <br />