Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />April 8, 1992 <br /> <br />Paget <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />7 . More detailed design information should be provided concerning <br />site lighting. <br /> <br />8. Further analysis of bedroom mix vs. market should be <br />investigated. <br /> <br />9. Further review of handicap accessibility issues should be <br />explored. <br /> <br />10. The amount of blacktop on the site should be reviewed and <br />reduced if possible. <br /> <br />11. An overall design should be reconsidered and the possibility <br />of upgrading the units should be investigated. <br /> <br />12. Additional investigation should be made on alternatives to <br />provide additional parking at locations other than on the <br />north roadway. <br /> <br />13. Alternatives to provide a natural screening buffer between the <br />development and the pond should be investigated. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Thomas, Stokes, Goedeke, <br />Wietecki, DeBenedet <br /> <br />Harms, <br /> <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />The Planning Commission recessed at 9:45 p.m. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission reconvened at 9:52 p.m. <br /> <br />Other Business <br /> <br />Sketch plan review of William Siever request for special use permit <br />for an automobile service use (Jiffy Lube) and for site plan <br />approval and setback variance at 1526 W. County Road B. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Shardlow summarized the history of the Jiffy Lube proposal and the <br />revised proposal being presented. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Issues discussed included pylon signs, the amount of signage, the <br />free standing trash enclosure, ownership, driveway and driveway <br />consolidation. <br /> <br />MOTION <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />ol.~:i"")' Q.4J..;&;a,Q,~,&""'''''' Q.&U.....L&\1&u1;i.&.L....i:I. <br />