My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_920708
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1992
>
pm_920708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:55 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/8/1992
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />July 8, 1992 <br /> <br />Paget <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />whether there would be similar requests in the future. <br /> <br />Angelo Johnson, 2233 Rosewood Lane South, expressed concerns about <br />drainage and the impact of the construction of a new house on his <br />property. <br /> <br />MOTION <br /> <br />Thomas moved and Roberts seconded a motion to recommend approval of <br />city of Roseville request for vacation of drainage easement at 2228 <br />and 2234 Rosewood Lane North. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Thomas, Stokes, Goedeke, Roberts, <br />wietecki, DeBenedet <br /> <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Other Business <br /> <br />speedskating Facility. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Bob Bierscheid introduced the consultants working on the project. <br /> <br />Dennis Sutliff, from BRW, explained BRW's role, highlighted their <br />preliminary findings concerning the speedskating facility as well <br />as a master plan for the civic center complex. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Items discussed included the Planning Commission's role in the <br />review process, whether a second ice sheet was being considered, <br />parking, traffic, noise, funding, soil problems, impact on <br />utilities, berms, landscaping, impact on adjacent wetland, and <br />whether the facility could be used for other uses. <br /> <br />MOTION <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />Potential ordinance amendments to require housing inspections when <br />homes are sold. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Shardlow highlighted what has previously occurred in relation to <br />this item and what the current proposal under consideration <br />entailed. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Issues discussed included what happens to inspection reports, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.