Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />July 8, 1992 <br /> <br />paget <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />whether the information in the reports is public information, which <br />report form would be used, whether someone on city staff should be <br />certified, fees, how immediate health and safety problems would be <br />identified in the report, the need to address wells, the need for <br />more realistic insurance requirements, and whether the ordinance <br />was needed at all. <br /> <br />Karen Christopherson, from the st. Paul Board of Realtors, stated <br />that her group was satisfied with the ordinance in general and <br />pointed it out that it would provide protection to all parties <br />involved. Christopherson pointed out that Chapter 34 of the st. <br />Paul code is being rewritten but this shouldn't have a major effect <br />on Roseville's proposed ordinance. <br /> <br />City staff was directed to schedule the formal Planning Commission <br />hearing on this matter for August 12, 1992. <br /> <br />MOTION <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />sign Ordinance. <br /> <br />Shardlow indicated that this item has been scheduled for <br />consideration at the July 20, 1992 city council Work Session and <br />that the Planning Commission was invited to attend this meeting. <br /> <br />Jopke distributed a memorandum outlining the Police Department's <br />recommendations concerning window signage. <br /> <br />Native species Ordinance. <br /> <br />Jopke agreed to check on status of this matter and report back to <br />the Commission. <br /> <br />MOTION <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />Adiournment <br /> <br />There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 8:58 p.m. <br />