My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_940112
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1994
>
pm_940112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:34:12 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/12/1994
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Wednesday, January 12, 1994 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Peterson also explained that the Grandview driveway will be moved to reduce headlight <br />glare into existing houses on the north side of Grandview. He also explained that the <br />building elevations have been varied to include more and different types of building <br />walls and roof lines to eliminate the barracks look of the original project. <br /> <br />Member Wall asked if fire truck access to the driveways along the south side of the <br />project have been provided and reviewed by the Fire Marshal. The staff responded that <br />the driveways have been reviewed by the fire marshall and have been approved. <br /> <br />John Peterson explained the landscape plan for the entire site and the detail plan around <br />each unit. Chairman Wietecki expressed concern about the number of trees along the <br />south side and adjacent to the Highway 36 corridor. <br /> <br />Jim Johnson, Traffic Engineer from Bolton and Menk Consultants, provided an <br />overview of the traffic volumes to be generated from the site. He stated that 5.8 trips <br />per unit per day can be expected, and that a total of 340 trips per day would be <br />generated by the entire project. Of the 170 trips leaving this site, 65 percent will move <br />to the south on Lexington to Highway 36~ 15 percent of the trips will be to the north on <br />Lexington and beyond B2~ 10 percent of the trips will be to the west around B2~ and <br />10 percent of the trips will be to the east on B2, Grandview or Lovell. <br /> <br />Member Harms stated that left-turn crossings at Lexington will be difficult and asked <br />if it would be possible for drivers to use B2 to head west and then enter Highway 36 <br />from Hamline. Member Sandstrom asked for the total impact of this project upon the <br />traffic that currently exists on Lexington Avenue. Jim Johnson responded that the total <br />number of trips created by the Good Value project would add between 1 and 1 1/2 <br />percent to the volume of traffic existing on Lexington Avenue at this time. He also <br />explained that trip generation at shopping centers or service centers will be much higher <br />than residential uses proposed in this project. The businesses try to attract or depend <br />upon the trips located along Lexington Avenue; whereas, housing simply uses it for <br />entrance and exits to the residence. Johnson explained that it would be not possible to <br />have traffic signals at either Grandview or Lovell onto Lexington Avenue, because this <br />would simply stack up traffic. However, he did state that additional traffic lanes or <br />coordinating the existing signals to allow for gaps in the traffic flow would be a less <br />expensive and more efficient solution to providing capacity for the Good Value <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.