My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_940112
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1994
>
pm_940112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:34:12 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/12/1994
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Wednesday, January 12, 1994 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />1. There is no landscaping plans with the file. <br /> <br />J. The roadway system shown on the plans scales 20 to 21 feet in width. <br />The roads need to be not less then 24 feet in width. The existing roadway <br />at Lexington Avenue is 32 feet in width at this time. <br /> <br />k. That the landscape plan be amended and approved by City staff to <br />increase use of conifers and to provide a better buffer from Highway 36. <br /> <br />1. That City staff review the traffic study and confirm the numbers used. <br /> <br />m. That the applicant work with property owners across Grandview to <br />minimize impact of the driveway entrance. <br /> <br />n. That the design and building materials be as presented to the Planning <br />Commission in site and building plans dated for the 1/12/94 Planning <br />Commission meeting. <br /> <br />Roll Call: Ayes: Sandstrom, Rengel, Thomas, Wall, Harms, Wietecki <br /> <br />Nayes: None <br /> <br />In a. general discussion following the motion, the consensus of the Planning <br />Commission was that there is a need for higher density, particularly if it is done well. <br />But such high density needs to have appropriate buffers between it and single-family <br />units. There needs to be better traffic and engineering plans as well as the ability to <br />refine the details of the Site Plan. In addition, such projects should be used as buffers <br />instead of business which creates higher volume traffic and noise problems adjacent to <br />a family residential area. <br /> <br />(b) Planning File 2633 <br /> <br />Rottlund Company, Inc. request for a rezoning from R-1 to Residential Planned Unit <br />Development, approval of a preliminary concept Planned Unit Development plan and <br />final Planned Unit Development Plan, approval of a preliminary and fmal plat, and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.