My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_940713
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1994
>
pm_940713
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:34:20 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/13/1994
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />10 <br /> <br />including letters from T. R. Reiken, 1697 Hamline Avenue; Ciclia Lindstrom, 1707 <br />Hamline Avenue; Robert and Sharon Hardy, 1717 Hamline Avenue; and Judy and Joseph <br />Pinski, 1723 Hamline Avenue. Chairman Wietecki indicated that these letters would be <br />made part of the official record. <br /> <br />Chairman Wietecki closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Thomas moved, seconded by Member Roberts, to recommend denial <br />because the proposed beauty shop did not provide a proper land use transition between <br />low density residential use on the north side of the site in question and the commercial use <br />on the south side of the property, that the proposed expansion of the commercial uses <br />along Hamline would not be consistent with the Vista 2000 goals to not expand existing <br />commercial areas. <br /> <br />Member Rengel stated that it was a nice design, but it is located in the wrong spot. <br /> <br />Member Thomas indicated that she was trouble with the level of effort that has gone into <br />this proposal and that it should have been done as a sketch plan. <br /> <br />Chairman Wietecki stated that the proposal is not consistent with the Vista 2060 statement <br />not to expand existing commercial areas. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: Rengel, Thomas, Wall, Harms, Roberts, Sandstrom, Wietecki. <br /> <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Chairman Wietecki polled the audience on which remaining items they were present for, and, <br />based on that moved the Comprehensive Plan forward on the Agenda. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />(c) <br /> <br />Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing <br /> <br />Chairman Wietecki opened up the Comprehensive Plan Hearing. <br /> <br />Scott Current, representing the Lake McCarrons Neighborhood Association questioned <br />the definition oflow density versus medium density, why medium density is being <br />proposed, pointed out existing traffic problems along Rice Street, and questioned the <br />condition and speed limits which would be present when County roads are turned back to <br />the city. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director, Rick Jopke, explained that low density is <br />zero to four units per acre and medium density is four to ten units per acre. <br /> <br />Chairman Wietecki explained that no recommendation has been made concerning Site 15- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.