My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_940810
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1994
>
pm_940810
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:34:20 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/10/1994
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />7. No plan for the tax increment financing feasibility study. <br />8. No complete plan for the church's future expansion. <br />9. There are other alternatives for development that have not been discussed. <br />10. Different types of transitional housing should be explored. <br />11. The church infunges upon the homeowner's expectations. <br /> <br />Mr. Cunningham asked for clarification regarding who the investors are; and, who the <br />beneficiaries of the tax credits for the project would be. He also asked if the project <br />would continue to be a senior project after the 15-year federal commitment. <br /> <br />Jim Ballentine, 1883 West Ryan, stated the project was a good opportunity for senior <br />residences in the neighborhood and near to support services. It would allow residents to <br />share in and grow old in Roseville. <br /> <br />Tom Galush, 1864 Eldridge Avenue, stated that he agreed with Mr. Cunningham's <br />opposition to the project, noting that the project was squeezed on the site and that green <br />space was inadequate. He also was concerned about the school site being reduced, and <br />the number of retaining walls and ponds utilized could be a safety hazard to children in the <br />area. He expressed opposition to in-wall air conditioning units as aesthetically unpleasing. <br />He stated that, on Sundays, the Corpus Cristi Church parking area is already over- <br />capacity. He asked if the number of units already in Roseville was necessary, and whether <br />this additional senior housing site was required. <br /> <br />Dorothy Manke, no address given, stated that all seniors cannot afford Eagle Crest or <br />Rosewood Estates, and that Roseville needs affordable housing for its seniors. <br /> <br />Diane Madden, 1876 Gluek Lane, stated she was opposed to the project because the <br />density was too high and asked how this project would fit into the City's Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br /> <br />Resident, 1841 Eldridge Avenue, stated he was opposed to the project as per the <br />opposition listed by Mr. Cunningham. He is also opposed to the project because it would <br />add traffic, decrease safety, and increase noise. He stated this was not a quiet, peaceful <br />site for retirement. <br /> <br />Tom Vella, 1994 Fairview, stated he supported the project and was looking for a senior <br />site in Roseville for relatives. He stated the traffic was not bad, and there is a need for <br />affordable senior housing in the community. <br /> <br />There was no further public comment. <br /> <br />Chairman Keith Wietecki closed the public hearing and read into the record the letters <br />ITom Borden and Sizer opposing the project. <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.