My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_941109
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1994
>
pm_941109
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:34:24 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/9/1994
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Falk noted that there are 3 new lots to be platted on the west side of the cul-de-sac. <br />To the east ofthe Woessner site is a 47 foot wide parcel. Th eowner thinks the 47 foot <br />parcel is also developable. <br /> <br />Chairperson Wietecki asked ifthere are other 47 foot lots in the area. (no). <br /> <br />Member Thomas asked if the fire staff has reviewed this proposal. (no) Has there been <br />one on a cul-de-sac before? <br /> <br />Chairperson Wietecki asked about the flag lot to the east. <br /> <br />Member Wall asked if the 73 foot wide lot should be expanded to 85 feet and reduce the <br />flag lot drive area. He preferred a narrower flag and allowing both lots, based, in part, on <br />the past log approvals. <br /> <br />Tom Woessner, on behalf of Mary Woessner, the property owner, noted that lots on <br />County Road B are less than 85 feet in width. <br /> <br />Chairperson Wietecki stated his concern was for the 47 feet to the east which, if not <br />included, would be a wasted parcel. Tom Woessner agreed and felt that eventually the <br />lots should be combined. Could a normal house be placed in the proposed Lot 1 without <br />varainces? (Yes, with design details ). <br /> <br />Member Harms asked if 3 lots could be created if lots 1 and 2 could be combined with the <br />47 foot wide lot. (It may be possible). <br /> <br />Member Wall asked whether the sewer line served the neighborhood? (yes). <br /> <br />Dave Woessner asked if the applicant should proceed with the 2 lot subdivision. The <br />Commission consensus was to proceed but to work with staff and adjoining neighbors. <br /> <br />8. INFORMA TION REPORTS AND OTHER BUSINESS: <br /> <br />a. Park and Recreation Commission request for separate zoning classification for public <br />land. <br /> <br />Staff was directed to prepare a schedule for spring hearings on zoning. <br /> <br />MOTION: Member Wietecki moved, seconded by Member Thomas to endorse the Park <br />and Recreation Commission recommendation for a Trail and Pathway Committee to <br />complete a trail plan as expeditiously as possible. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.