My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_950111
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1995
>
pm_950111
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:34:24 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/11/1995
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Chairperson Wietecki asked whether a road can extend north to Owasso Boulevard <br />(railroad crossing, pipeline, and grades). <br /> <br />Chairperson Wietecki asked if all roads would be public? (Yes) <br /> <br />Marty Harstad, developer, explained his development relationship with Roberts and <br />Grauel. The issues are: <br /> <br />a. pipeline <br />b. terrain changes from Pratt Townhomes <br />c. consistency with School District site plan <br />d. NURP ponding <br />e. roadway connections to Grauel <br /> <br />Member Thomas asked how the units along the east edge are accessible? Would the <br />association maintain all driveways? Member Thomas asked if a fire truck could reach <br />these end units? She also asked if these units will look like the units he has proposed <br />on the southwest comer of the school site? <br /> <br />Member Sandstrom asked where the maximum allowed 1000 foot cul-de-sac ends on <br />the Roberts site? Member Sandstrom also asked if flames from a pipeline rupture <br />would affect the housing? He asked if the Grauel property would help in the overall <br />design? Are all the backsides of these units discharging onto steep slopes. The <br />developer should convey roof water to the street side of the units. <br /> <br />Member Sandstrom asked about the status of the Pipeline Safety Committee. What <br />was their recommendation? (100 foot setback from pipeline) <br /> <br />Member Thomas asked if pipelines carry chemicals other than petro products? (petro <br />products only as per pipeline safety committee). <br /> <br />Chairperson Wietecki asked for sizes of units. (1900 sq. ft. and 1500 sq. ft.) <br /> <br />Member Thomas asked for clarification of timelines as compared to School District. <br />(Hope to work with District, but does not anticipate a 3 year time frame, probably 2 <br />years). <br /> <br />Member Thomas asked for landscaping appearance from wetland areas. Chairperson <br />Wietecki stated the project must be unified in design with the School District <br />property. The staff should look at road looped to Western. <br /> <br />d. Zoning Revisions and RFP Discussion <br /> <br />Dennis Welsch asked the Commission for direction regarding: <br /> <br />1) Zoning ordinance and map changes via incremental approach throughout year. <br />Staff is to develop a proposal on how to schedule this set of hearings. <br />2) RFP distributed for Arana and I35W/36 sites. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.