My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_950308
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1995
>
pm_950308
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:34:26 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/8/1995
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CITY OF ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />WEDNESDAY, MARCH 8, 1995 <br /> <br />Member Harms expressed concern about the lack of landscaping on the site and if the <br />Commission could include a condition to correct this deficiency with this approval. Falk <br />responded that landscaping is planned that would be consistent with the design standards <br />but that it had not been installed because of it being winter. <br /> <br />Member Harms asked if automobile leasing could be located anywhere in the City <br />without a special use permit, whether the special use permit stays with the property, and <br />what controls the number of cars which could be on the site. <br /> <br />Falk stated that the special use permit would be required no matter where a automobile <br />leasing agency were to locate and that the special use permit stays with the property, and <br />that a limit on the number of vehicles could be specified as part of the approval and that <br />any increase would require an amendment to the special use permit. <br /> <br />Member Wall asked if the suggestion that there be no outside display would limit outside <br />storage of vehicles. Falk responded that it would. <br /> <br />Chairman Wietecki asked if staff had a plan with specific dimensions of the space to be <br />utilized for the leasing of vehicles. Falk indicated that staff does have such a plan. <br /> <br />Member Harms asked what signage would be in place on the building. <br /> <br />Chairman Wietecki indicated that signage would be restricted by the sign ordinance and <br />that staff can approve that if its consistent with the sign ordinance. <br /> <br />Ronald Rich, attorney for Mr. Kath, apologized for the lateness of the materials, pointed <br />out that the proposal fits the City guidelines without adverse impact on adjacent property. <br /> <br />Chairman Wietecki closed the public hearing. There were no public comments or <br />questions. <br /> <br />Member Wall asked for additional information about past City approval of similar cases <br />and if there were any issues or problems with these other cases which he should be aware <br />of. <br /> <br />Chairman Wietecki stated that the main issues with other cases were trailer storage on the <br />site, impact on parking, and maintenance of vehicles on the site. He pointed out that <br />generally, the Commission recommended approval if those ordinance criteria were met. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.