Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CITY OF ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />WEDNESDAY, MARCH 8, 1995 <br /> <br />Mike Falk pointed out that a sign permit would still be required and that City staff would <br />review each request to insure that it is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Member Sandstrom suggested that maybe larger size signs should be permitted by special <br />use permit. <br /> <br />Chairman Wietecki stated that the City should not control signs that are not visible from <br />public streets. <br /> <br />Wietecki closed the public hearing. There were no public questions or comments. <br /> <br />Motion: <br /> <br />Member Rengel moved and Member Wietecki seconded to recommend <br />approval of the ordinance amendment as outlined in the staff report. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br />Nays: <br /> <br />Harms, Rengel, Sandstrom, Wall, Wietecki <br />None <br /> <br />The Planning Commission recessed at 8:45 p.m. and reconvened at 9:00 p.m. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />(c) <br /> <br />Planning File 2722: Kenneth Kath request for a special use permit for rental and <br />leasing of automobiles at 2611 Hamline Avenue North. <br /> <br />Mike Falk summarized the proposal. Mr. Falk testified that staff had reviewed the <br />proposal against the general conditions for granting a special use permit and found that <br />the building is compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan, that it will not negatively <br />impact the market value of contiguous properties, the site plan and internal traffic <br />circulation, landscaping, and building materials meet City design standards and are <br />compatible with contiguous properties, and that the development will not adversely <br />impact adjacent streets. <br /> <br />Chairman Wietecki expressed concern about the lateness of the receipt of the background <br />materials from the applicant. <br /> <br />Member Rengel asked for clarification about what issues needed to be considered this <br />evening and on which plan is to be considered. <br /> <br />Falk stated that the item is strictly the special use permit for leasing and is not related to <br />the night watchman's residence issue. <br /> <br />6 <br />