My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_950712
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1995
>
pm_950712
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:34:32 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:56:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/12/1995
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Roseville <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />July 12, 1995 <br /> <br />Member Rhody asked what the definition of a hardship was. City Planner Falk said that <br />hardship is defined in state statutes as being some unusual condition not created by the <br />applicant; such as, lot shape, topography, etc. and would not include economic hardship. <br /> <br />Member Sandstrom asked if this request was considered under the new or the old <br />Shoreline Management regulations, and whether or not the Department of Natural <br />Resources had been notified. City Planner Falk indicated that it comes under the new <br />ordinance, and that DNR has been notified. <br /> <br />Dan Oren, 2719 43rd Avenue South, #2B, formerly of367 South Owasso Boulevard, <br />stated that there was no bait and switch in this case and that he carefully presented and <br />communicated his plans to city staff. Mr. Oren pointed out the substandard nature of the <br />previous dwelling including faulty wiring, leaky windows, and no interior connection to <br />the basement. Mr. Oren stated his hardship was the time and design with an architect and <br />the difficulties of a narrow, tight lot. Mr. Oren added that they worked carefully with <br />such site considerations as sun angles, tree locations, and neighbor's window locations to <br />come up with the present design. <br /> <br />Jim Hale, representative and son of Mrs. Cederholm (the adjacent neighbor at 365 <br />Owasso Boulevard South) stated that they did not object to the original remodeling, but <br />now object to the new plan. Mr. Hale stated that Roseville should stand by its ordinances <br />and deny the variance. <br /> <br />David Johnson, attorney representing Brad Oren, 375 South Owasso Boulevard, stated <br />that his client objects to the variance because no hardship exists. Mr. Johnson stated that <br />the mistake by city staff does not constitute hardship, and that Dan Oren could build a <br />structure and meet the 75 foot setback requirement. Mr. Johnson further stated that the <br />proposed two-story structure, 37 feet from the lake, is not consistent with other structures <br />in the area which are set back 75 feet. Mr. Johnson concluded his comments by stating <br />that the structure would impact the view and fair market value of his client's site. <br /> <br />Brad Oren, 375 South Owasso Boulevard, stated that, while it was difficult to oppose his <br />brother's variance, it is necessary because 99 percent ofthe houses in the area are in line <br />and that the house is now gone so it would be no big deal to build a new house to meet <br />the ordinance requirements. <br /> <br />City of Roseville <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.