pm_950712 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of Roseville Planning Commission Minutes July 12, 1995 Mike Falk responded that other mitigating factors such as topography could be considered during the variance process. Chairman Wietecki asked if a private property owner would have to suffer the expense of getting a survey to develop their property. City Planner Falk responded "Yes" they would. Member Wall pointed out that the lateness of hour prevents good discussion of these important ordinance matters. Member Wall asked if there could potentially be a separate meeting to discuss ordinances so that the Planning Commission can provide the proper feedback to the city council. MOTION: Member Rhody moved, Chairman Wietecki seconded to continue this matter until August 9, 1995. ROLL CALL: Ayes: Wall, Sandstrom, Rhody, Harms, Wietecki Nays: None. 6. (h) Proposed Amendment to the Roseville City Code, Section 1009.03: regarding establishment of setback requirements for political campaign signs. Rick Jopke indicated that the city council has asked the Planning Commission to review and make recommendations concerning where political campaign signs can be located. A draft ordinance was presented which requires campaign signs to be set back at least 15 feet from the outside edge of pavement or the back of curb on all city and county roads, prohibits campaign signs on City of Roseville public property, requires the permission of a private property owner before placing signs on the property, and political campaign signs which cause any hazard to public safety. Mr. Jopke pointed out that the provision relating to the prohibition of signs of state right- of-way had been eliminated from the ordinance because the state indicated that they would enforce that provision on their own. Mr. Jopke recommended that the Planning Commission recommend the ordinance for city council approval. Member Sandstrom asked if the provision was the edge of pavement (Yes). 20