My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_951011
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1995
>
pm_951011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:34:34 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:56:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/11/1995
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />October 11, 1995 <br /> <br />requiring quarterly training sessions may be excessive. There may be a need to have <br />updates but not on a quarterly basis. However, she felt there should be a yearly training <br />seminar. Member Wall stated that a quarterly information session would be more <br />appropriate and that 18 months for training should read 6 months in order to get new <br />Planning Commission members up-to-date as quickly as possible. Member Harms <br />concurred. <br /> <br />Member Cunningham asked if mailing about seminars could be sent to the Commission. <br />Member Harms asked if the staff would spend more time with the Commission members. <br />Member Wall asked the Planning Commission to complete Item J within their Bylaws <br />which is the 14 ways to improve the Planning Commission. Member Sandstrom asked <br />what would be the consequences of not completing the training. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission, by consensus, directed the staff to rewrite the training section <br />to require a 6-month seminar if at all possible, but 12 months at maximum. <br /> <br />MOTION: Member Thein moved, seconded by Member Wall, to adopt the 1995 City of <br />Roseville, Planning Commission Bylaws with the changes to pages 1-4 and to submit the <br />Bylaws as completed to date to the City Council for confirmation. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Sandstrom, Harms, Cunningham, Wall, Thein <br /> <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />6. Public Hearines: (c). (d), (e) and (t) <br /> <br />The following Public Hearings were withdrawn by motion from Planning Commission <br />and sent to the Planning Commission's subcommittees for further study and action at a <br />future time. <br /> <br />(c) Proposed amendment of the Roseville City Code regarding establishment of <br />standards concerning deliveries, snow removal and trash collection in commercial <br />and industrial areas adjacent to residential areas. <br /> <br />(d) Proposed amendment of the Roseville City Code regarding establishment of <br />minimum standards for emergency vehicle access. <br /> <br />(e) Proposed amendments to the Roseville City Ordinance requiring certain building <br />construction setback from pipelines by amending the City Code of the City of <br />Roseville by adding Chapter 36. <br /> <br />(f) Proposed amendments to the Roseville City Ordinance regarding parking of <br />RV/Campers on residential properties. <br /> <br />MOTION: Member Harms moved, seconded by Member Wall, to withdraw from the <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.