My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_960710
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1996
>
pm_960710
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:34:46 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:56:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/10/1996
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br />July 10, 1996 <br /> <br />effective after approval signatures in publication. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br />Ayes: <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />Cunningham, Rhody, Wilke, Sandstrom, Harms, Wietecki <br />None <br /> <br />MOTION: Chairman Wietecki moved, seconded by Member Wilke, to recommend <br />approval of a Conditional Use Permit on Lot 1, Block 1, as per the Draft Resolution <br />PC7 11 0/96d with the addition/correction of 4 conditions: <br /> <br />#23 - If additional significant changes occur to the site plan because of internal traffic <br />flow redesign, the City Council will send the site plan back to the Planning Commission <br />for review. <br /> <br />#24 - The landscaping along the east side of the property line shall be attached to Lot 1 <br />by easement. <br /> <br />#25 - The fence along the west side of Lexington Avenue shall be constructed in the <br />adjoining property as per the proposal with the permission ofthe land owner. <br /> <br />#26 - Violation of the terms and conditions of the Conditional Use Permit shall be <br />considered a violation ofthe City Code and may include fines and/or revocation of the <br />permit. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION: Member Cunningham commended both the neighborhood and the <br />applicant, and said he felt the gas station will be an improvement to the corner. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br />Ayes: <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />Cunningham, Wilke, Sandstrom, Harms, Wietecki <br />Rhody <br /> <br />Member Rhody was opposed because of design issues. <br /> <br />MOTION: Member Wietecki moved, seconded by Member Harms to recommend <br />approval of a Draft Resolution PC? 11 0/96e approving the preliminary and final plat. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br />Ayes: <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />Cunningham, Rhody, Wilke, Sandstrom, Harms, Wietecki <br />None <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.