Laserfiche WebLink
any weekday and 9 AM to 9 PM on any weekend or legal holiday). <br />31.The City will review and approve pathway realignments and city pathway <br />plans to match pavements and provide a continuous pathway. <br />The motion passed 5-0. <br />Ayes: Rhody, Wilke, Thein, Cunningham, Wietecki. <br />Nayes: None <br />MOTION: <br />Member Wietecki moved, second by Member Thein, to <br />recommend approval of minor subdivisions to allow for administrative approval <br />for minor lot line reconfiguration (move the lot lines to fit the design of the <br />buildings) as the applicant applies for building permits. No new lots or roadways <br />would be created. <br />The motion passed 5-0. <br />Ayes: Rhody, Wilke, Thein, Cunningham, Wietecki. <br />Nayes: None <br />6(b)Planning File 2881. <br /> CSM request for preliminary and final replat, and <br />any necessary vacations on 8.35 acres within <br />portions of Lot 1, Lot 2, and portions of Lot 3 Block 1, <br />commonly known as a portion of Centre Pointe <br />Business Park <br />Chairman Keith Wietecki opened the public hearing and requested Community <br />Development Director Dennis Welsch to provide a brief verbal summary of his <br />3/26/97 written report and recommendations. Welsch explained that the CSM <br />request was made in order to reconfigure three lots into fours lots to provide one <br />lot for each of 2 restaurants and 2 hotels. There are no new roads or utilities <br />proposed. There is adequate capacity in underground water and sewer to serve <br />the sites. The storm ponds are being reconfigured to meet the requirements of <br />Rice Creek Watershed. Park dedication would be required, including dedication <br />of the pathway and cash in lieu for the remainder of the dedication. Sidewalks <br />within the right-of-way would be required as part of the on-site improvement. The <br />staff recommended approval of the request as presented. <br />A general discussion ensued regarding the location of this new plat as part of <br />the replatting of the site. The Planning Commission <br />agreed that the plat itself met city requirements. <br />MOTION: <br />Member Wietecki moved, second by Member Cunningham to <br />recommend approval of the CSM preliminary and final plat of four lots, as per the <br />10 <br />