My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_970611
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1997
>
pm_970611
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:35:00 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:56:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/11/1997
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
surface drive. Chairman Wietecki expressed Commission’s right to consider the whole <br />property; felt some hardship was present and applicant could expand without making <br />site more non-conforming. <br />Member Rhody stated it was a good addition; that it didn’t impact the noise level; that <br />the applicant, and their architect, were working hard to improve the existing housing <br />stock; that the driveway is an issue; that he supports the variance request. <br />Member Cunningham asked about the elevation of homes on the north side and was <br />advised the south side elevation was lower; that he was in favor of granting the <br />variance request, with the staff recommended conditions. <br />Member Wilke stated the addition was an improvement; discussed possibility of turning <br />driveway around and entering into garage off of Burke. <br />Member Thein discussed separation of issues of addition to house and concerns with <br />drive. Further discussion ensued with expressed concerns about driveway. <br />Motion: <br /> Member Wietecki moved, seconded by Member Wilke, to recommend <br />approval of the Variance, subject to removal of the driveway. <br />The motion passed 5-0. <br />Ayes: Cunningham, Rhody, Wietecki, Thein, Wilke <br />Nays: None <br />Recess was called. <br />7(a)Cornerstone Design Program. <br />Steve Quam presented a Design Event overview and summarized handouts. Paul <br />Madson discussed the principals and concepts identified by the Design Team. <br />Chairman Wietecki stated that an important next step is to determine what changes are <br />necessary to allow proposed changes (such as Code changes) and felt parking next to <br />a residential neighborhood could be a problem. Paul Madson advised the parking issue <br />had been expressed. Chairman Wietecki stated a buffer design is important. <br />Chairman Wietecki indicated that Hamline/Co. Rd. B could be connected to other uses <br />as there appeared to be enough critical mass, whereas other intersections were more <br />isolated. Steve Quam indicated that increased critical mass was part of the designs. <br />Chairman Wietecki asked for discussion of the issues. <br />Sylvester Bende (behind Keller Building)l: Like the 30' setback; noise from parking lot <br />an issue; high traffic increase by the Library; money was not well spent on this Study. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.