My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_980408
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1998
>
pm_980408
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:35:13 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:56:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/8/1998
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
details of the tree removal and replacement with fast growing materials. She <br />commented that the building looks 2 to 3 stories. <br />Jim Priesmenthy, 1670 Lydia, expressed concern of the project encroachment to <br />the west, toward the creek. This bulding will be closest to the creek. The mature <br />trees will be lost and the high ground will make the buildng more obvious. <br />Chair Harms asked if landscape specifications can be added. <br />Chair Harms commented on the roof slope and the design elements; she has no <br />problem with the change in the size of the building. A general discussion <br />ensued. <br />Member Cunningham noted that the high roof in the center area is for a light, <br />airy common space. <br />There being no further comments, Chair Harms closed the hearing. <br />Motion: <br /> Member Rhody moved, Member Wilke seconded, to recommend <br />approval of the request to amend the EagleCrest PUD in order to increase the <br />size of the building approved for the northwest corner of the site from 26,500 <br />square feet to 32,900 square feet, based on the findings set forth in the staff <br />report dated April 8, 1998, and the following conditions recommended by staff: <br />1.The site must be developed in accordance with the plans submitted and <br />approved in conjunction with the request for an amendment to the <br />approved planned unit development (site plan dated 3/9/98; grading, <br />drainage, erosion control, & utilities plan dated 3/9/98; landscape plan <br />dated 3/9/98; building floor plan dated 3/9/98; and exterior building <br />elevations dated 3/9/98). Minor variations from the approved site plan <br />? <br />may be approved by the Citys Development Review Committee, under <br />the direction of the Community Development Director; however, any <br />substantial departures from the approved site plan will require another <br />amendment to the planned unit development. <br />2.Final grading and utility plans must be reviewed and approved by the <br />Public Works Director. Since the impervious surface on the site will <br />increase, the applicant will need to contact the Rice Creek Watershed <br />District for permit requirements. <br />3.The erosion problem along the western edge of the property must be <br />corrected in conjunction with site development. <br />Motion carried 7-0. <br /> Ayes: Rhody, Wilke, Mulder, Olson, Klausing, Cunningham,Harms <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.