pm_980708 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Deb Schreier asked how a P.U.D. changes uses over time. Jim Schreier explained the finances for this project and how does one start a P.U.D.? Member Mulder noted the City must eventually resolve the nonconforming uses. The P.U.D. must be for the entire site. It may be a longer term five to seven year project. He would strongly oppose expanison of the non-conforming use and/or a spot rezoning. Jim Schreier asked if the neighbors should be part of the process (Chair Harms: Yes). Chair Harms suggested going ahead with the P.U.D. and at the same time get the neighborhood together. Try to have the neighborhood meeting before proposing a solution for your site to allow for the neighbors to understand the issues. As a sketch plan review, the P.U.D. on your parcels is the best approach including a definitive plan as to when the houses would be removed. Member Mulder stated the houses should be removed to reduce the internal mix of uses. The Commission listed some issues that should be in the P.U.D.: Member Cunningham: Woodworking, cabinet general business; Member Mulder: Noise restrictions, air quality, berming, screening, sprinklered building, gutters/curbs, exterior materials, landscaping, signage; Member Olson: Setbacks at rear of building; no exit to rear, but architectural interest; Member Cunningham: Privacy fence; define future uses on site and future value Member Rhody/Chair Harms: Include homes and business in same P.U.D. so that they could still live on site with appropriate uses. 8.Information, Reports and Other Business (Verbal Reports). 8a. Planning File 3047. Draft Minor Variance Ordinance Kim Lee presented reports on “works in progress” regarding minor variances. Chair Harms noted this cannot occur in shoreland zones. * Why is there such a high cost? * Without neighbors consent, must an applicant go to full variance? 8