pm_981014 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

explained his limited needs for parking (14 spaces), whereas the Code would require 31 spaces.Schreiers will agree to add the north parcel, adjacent to the shop for future expansion and parking, through a “proof of parking” requirement. John Simon, 3062 N. Cleveland, has not had problems with Schreier’s use. He does not want business zoning because it could restrict expansion of his house. RandyBriggle, 3080 N. Cleveland, lives adjacent to the cabinet shop and supports the proposal, but not the expansion to the residence. WillBoehlke, 3070 Cleveland, supports the business in the neighborhood. He said noise comes from across the street (Cleveland) and 35W. He opposed a business zone. Mary Reed, 2000 Brenner, did not receive a letter relating to this. Change is coming. From Brenner to the south there will be change (Freida Schultz property). She said eventually this will be business areas. Why would the city allow a builder in this area. She opposes businesses abutting residential. There should be a buffer. There needs to be more privacy. Traffic is expanding. Proposal #1 (Hearing #1) Includes only the property occupied by Charles Cabinet at 3090 Cleveland Avenue North in the Comprehensive Plan amendment and planned unit development (requested by James and DebSchreier). Chair Harms asked for comment on proposal and opened hearing #1. Jean Carlson, who lives behind the cabinet shop on Wilder Street, stated the shop is very quiet and unobtrusive. She asked how many trees will be lost? This use is compatible. RobBriggle, 3080 N. Cleveland, supported the rezoning and expansion of the applicant’s site. Nancy Simpson, 3083 Mt. Ridge Road, stated she supports alternative #1. TimothyKotecki, 3078 Mt. Ridge Road, asked for the expansion size (doubles the size). MemberMulder asked what are the “base uses” in a B-1 zone. Kim Lee read the B-1 list from the City Code. 3