Laserfiche WebLink
Nays: None <br />1 <br />2 <br />1.Communications From The Public: <br />3 <br />4 <br />None. <br />5 <br />6 <br />5.Consent Agenda: <br />7 <br />8 <br />None. <br />9 <br />10 <br />6. <br />Public Hearings: <br />11 <br />12 <br />6a.Planning File 3049. <br /> Prince of Peace Lutheran Church and Senior Housing <br />13 <br />Partners, LLC, are requesting an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to <br />14 <br />change the future land use designation of a 6.1 acre parcel from Church to High <br />15 <br />Density Residential (2561 Victoria Street North) and the designation of a 2.1 <br />16 <br />acre parcel from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential (2555 <br />17 <br />Victoria Street North). Prince of Peace Lutheran Church and Senior Housing <br />18 <br />Partners, LLC, are also requesting concept development plan approval for a <br />19 <br />mixed use planned unit development on the entire 8.2 acre site including the <br />20 <br />existing Prince of Peace Lutheran Church, a 56-unit three-story senior housing <br />21 <br />building and an off-street parking area. <br />22 <br />23 <br />Chair Katie Harms stepped down and left the meeting during the portion of the meeting <br />24 <br />relating to PF3049. <br />25 <br />26 <br />Acting Chair John Rhody opened the hearing and requested Dennis Welsch provide a <br />27 <br />verbal summary of the background report dated December 9, 1998 regarding the site, <br />28 <br />comprehensive plan, zoning and site details as they relate to the Prince of Peace site. <br />29 <br />30 <br />ChrisHenningson, representing Prince of Peace Lutheran Church, introduced Pastor Vern <br />31 <br />Rice who described the process of acquiring the Huberty site. The Church needs more <br />32 <br />parking and also recognized the need for senior housing (as a church community mission). <br />33 <br />The Church has child care, school of music, and Alcoholics Anonymous on the site. The <br />34 <br />Church sees the senior housing as an asset to the Church and the park. <br />35 <br />36 <br />Bob Van Slyke, Senior Housing Partners, noted that the original concept was senior <br />37 <br />cooperative, but now will be a lease hold cooperative. This project would create a 501c3 <br />38 <br />corporation that would lease the land to a cooperative corporation. The 501c# would be <br />39 <br />responsible for maintenance and upkeep. The project seeks to use tax-exempt housing <br />40 <br />bonds. The lease hold cooperative will pay homestead taxes.Forty percent of the units <br />41 <br />will be occupied by residents with 60% or less of the median income. The developer will <br />42 <br />market to Roseville first. The two costs in the cooperative are down payment and monthly <br />43 <br />housing cost. <br />44 <br />45 <br />Mr. Van Slyke noted the changes the developer has made in location, height, parking and <br />46 <br />impact on the park. Its proximity to the Church and park make it ideal. Trip generations <br />47 <br />for senior housing was made available. <br />48 <br />49 <br />MemberKlausing asked if the housing would be affordable and what would be the cost. <br />50 <br />Mr. Van Slyke said the share purchase (down payment) would reduce the monthly housing <br />51 <br />expense payment. He gave examples of project costs in Roseville and Shoreview. <br />52 <br />MemberKlausing asked if the price could be guaranteed today. (No, the cost of the <br />53 <br />building is still unknown). <br />54 <br />55 <br />MemberMulder asked if a purchaser actually purchases equity (yes, limited equity). <br />56 <br />Page2 of 12 <br />