pm_981209 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Chair Katie Harms re-entered the meeting. 1 2 6b.Planning File 3086. Thomas and Kathleen Diffley and WF Bauer Homes are 3 requesting a variance to increase the impervious surface coverage of a parcel, located at 4 1230BelairCt., within a shoreland management district to 35% for the purpose of 5 regrading the site and constructing a single family residence on an undeveloped parcel. 6 7 Chair Katie Harms opened the hearing and requested City Planner Kim Lee to provide a 8 verbal summary of her staff report dated December 9, 1998. Ms. Lee reviewed the history 9 of the site and the home selected by the applicant. 10 11 Chair Harms asked if the lot was pre-existing non-conforming (yes), but the coverage issue 12 is not pre-existing. 13 14 There were no comments or questions from the public. 15 16 Motion: Member Rhody moved, seconded by Member Mulder, to recommend City 17 Council approval of the request for a variance, by Thomas and Kathleen Diffley/WF 18 Bauer Homes, to increase the impervious surface coverage of a parcel (1230 Belair Circle) 19 in a shoreland management district to 35% for the purpose of regrading the site and 20 constructing a single family residence on an undeveloped parcel. 21 22 Ayes: 6 23 Nays: 0 24 Motion carried 6-0. 25 26 Chair Harms moved Items 6c and 6d to the end of the Agenda, after Section 7 discussion 27 items. 28 29 7. PresentationsAnd Other Actions: 30 31 7b. Planning File 3088. Sketch Plan for Proposed Townhomes located at 185 32 McCarrons Street, by Ms Rae Reidemann. 33 34 DennisWelsch provided a background report in which he described the sketch plan 35 request. 36 37 Chair Harms asked if this may be premature. 38 39 Ms.Reidemann (owner) stated that other lots have been redeveloped similarly. The 40 current home has structural problems; the roof and floors need work; ceilings are cracking. 41 She proposes a quad home with 1691 square feet per unit, two levels with garage on first 42 level. She said the existing house is 83 years old. 43 44 MemberWilke asked how each unit would be given access. Ms. Reidemann suggested 4 45 garages on one side with 8 parking spaces. He asked if variances may be necessary (not 46 known at this time). 47 48 Chair Harms stated the project was premature and too dense. A duplex may be possible. 49 The Shady Beach comparison is not a similar situation. 50 51 Member Cunningham asked how many units and whether the existing house should be 52 retained. 53 54 Ms.Reidemann stated a 4-plex would be low density and much nicer than current house. 55 The interior court yard could be covered. 56 Page9 of 12