pm_991013 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

along Alta Vista and was constructed as a component of the roadway reconstruction. The second retaining wall is located in the side yard adjacent to the home and Dale Street. 6. A small rear/side yard (north & east) exists on the north side of the lot and home. Because this is the only flat area on the lot the three children use the location for a play area. 7. The proposed porch addition, though encroaching to a point 8.6 feet from the Alta Vista Drive property line, would provide an architectural design and living area that would not be afforded to the homeowners unless placed on the north side of the home and within the play area. 8. Staff has determined that the limited flat area on the lot, the unique shape of the lot, the lot's double frontage, and the date the home was constructed, are all pre-existing hardships for this property that afford no alternative other than a variance. 9. The variance, if granted, will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare of the citizens of Roseville. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 Motion passes. 6c. Planning File 3158. Arthur's Jewelers, 1745 Lexington Avenue, is requesting an 8 foot variance from Section 1 005.01A (front yard setback) to allow construction of covered entry onto the former Norwest Bank building, 1717 Lexington Avenue, into the required 30 foot front yard setback. This application (Planning File 3158) was withdrawn by the applicant. 6d. Planning File 3143. City of Roseville request for an amendment to Section 1010.11 of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance, regulating large commercial recycling compactors. Chair Klausing opened the public hearing and requested Thomas Paschke to provide a summary of the project report dated October 13, 1999. Thomas Paschke discussed the proposed ordinance and the rationale for the proposal. He indicated the proposed ordinance was unclear as to how R-1 uses, such as churches, municipal buildings, school districts etc., and multiple family zoning districts would be affected by this ordinance. He suggested the Commission could address this at tonight's meeting, or he would address it and return the ordinance for the Commission's consideration at the November 1999 meeting. Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Klausing, to table to November 9, 1999 meeting, consideration of the proposed ordinance regulating large commercial recycling compactors to allow time for staff to address, under Section 4, C, relating to R-1 zoning district uses and multiple housing district uses. Member Cunningham asked if the ordinance would be retroactive affecting pre-existing, non-conforming uses; Thomas Paschke advised it would not. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 Motion passes. 7. Presentations and Other Actions 7a. Sketch Plan: Dr. Robert Smith, 545 Ryan Thomas Paschke, City Planner, advised there was insufficient information submitted by the applicant for the Commission to review. 7b. Sketch Plan: Linnise Development Corporation, Budd Batterson, 1323 Burke Avenue, Multiple Family Thomas Paschke discussed the proposal of Linnise Development Corporation to construct 11 owner occupied town homes on the single family home site at 1323 Burke and advised if the proposal proceeds, it would require a