pm_000209 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

conditions outlined in the staff report of February 9, 2000, as follows: 1. The project as proposed meet the criteria required listed in Section 1013.01 D of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance. The proposed project is a permitted conditional use as stipulated in Section 1004.02 C of the R 1, Single Family Residential District requirements and is consistent with the Roseville Comprehensive Plan. 2. Over the course of the past two months, staff has reviewed four specific site plans for the proposed clubhouse and site modifications. The development plan set, dated by the City as February 4,2000, is considered the Master Concept Plan. All reviews and conditions specified below are based upon these plans. 3. Staff has determined the setbacks for the proposed improvements meet or exceed the Ordinance requirements for structure and parking lot locations. Though there are no specific standards for setbacks other than the 50-foot minimum requirement, staff uses the business structure and parking standards. In the case of the proposed structure, the 150-foot setback from property line exceeds the requirement of 30 feet for business structure proposed adjacent residential property. 4. The parking lot setback of approximately 135 feet from the nearest residential property line exceeds the 10 foot business parking lot setback requirement. The site also provides a landscape buffer greater than the 10 foot buffer strip required for business development adjacent residential districts. 5. The basement area of the proposed clubhouse shall only be used for auxiliary office operation, storage and golf cart storage. Any future change in the use of the basement area to something other than indicated above may require an amendment to the CU P. 6. Staff has determined the revised landscape plan to meets or exceeds the requirements contained in the City Code. The proposal also provides greater screening to address neighborhood concerns. 7. Staff has determined the 278 off-street parking spaces indicated on the site plan to be adequate for the site. The City Code does not specifically address requirements for golf courses. Staff has calculated the required parking in the following manner: o Six spaces for each of the 18 holes of golf or 108 off-street parking stalls. o Five (5) spaces for each 1,000 square feet of net main level square footage (28,050 square feet) or 140 off-street parking stalls. o The total number required under the City's calculation is 248 off-street parking stalls. 8. A final landscape plan (including an overlay of landscaping on the grading plan) shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permit. This plan should include all size and species proposed on the site. The plan will be reviewed by the City and presented to the adjacent property owners for review and comment. Should modifications be appropriate, the plan will be revised and determined to be the final landscape plan. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the City shall receive a bond for 150% of the cost of the landscaping. 9. A final grading (including silt fence location and detail), drainage and utility plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The grading plan shall include concrete curb and gutter, landscaped islands, and storm water catch basins. The drainage plan shall include an impervious site calculation, storm water calculation, and the measures (ponds or infiltration areas) taken to meet the City's storm water management requirements. 10. The Business District Requirements for structure height is three (3) stories. The City has determined the height of the proposed structure shall not exceed two (2) stories or 32 feet as measured from the midpoint of the roof peak. 11. All trash and recycling containers shall be fully enclosed per Section 1010.11 D of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance. 12. Signage and outdoor lighting plans meeting the City Code requirements shall be submitted with the building permit application. 13. Minor changes to the Master Plan (less than 10% of the building footprint) may be approved administratively by staff. 14. All future changes/additions to the site plan including structure additions over 1,000 s.f. of the footprint; or off-street parking; or a swimming pool; or a tennis facility shall require an amendment to the CUP. Carried: 6 - 0 Member Cunningham asked for clarification on the 1,000 s.f. amendment vs 10% of building size for administrative amendment. Member Olson asked for more landscape plans for landscape preservation of the south edge of parking lots. On the west side, more evergreen landscaping along the edge of the parking lot should be required (The parking lot is not being expanded). Member Wilke said he was satisfied with the changes. The City staff will work with the applicant. Member Egli noted the large building mass, recommending no change to the east side of the building. In the motion, conditions 3.1 - 3.14 should be included. Chair Klausing asked for details of regulating speaker systems. The building will have non-opening windows. If doors are propped open, the noise may be a nuisance. Member Egli asked that new additional noise be regulated. Member Cunningham asked if the outside banquet expansion would strain the liquor license. This should be reviewed by the City Council. Member Mulder noted there are risks to the club for non-compliance of licenses. Motion: Member Egli moved, seconded by Member Klausing, to recommend a condition be added that no amplified sound be added beyond the current practice. Motion withdrawn by Members Egli and Klausing. Mr. Bessinger said there are no outside speakers at this time. Member Mulder asked about special events such as outdoor weddings. The entire noise ordinance needs to be revisited.