pm_000412 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Member Olson agreed that the height limit should be included. Chair Klausing suggested four stories for offices, but with no more than 60 feet in height. Member Mulder explained differences with existing buildings and adding stories above existing buildings. Member Cunningham supported the four stories of office without a height limitation, noting that economics will dictate the height factor. There was no comment offered by the public and therefore Chair Klausing closed the hearing. Member Egli suggested that setbacks of industrial offices be increased proportionately, especially near residential properties by a formula as follows: desired height divided by 45 times the setback adjacent to residential. A general discussion ensued. Motion. Member Rhody moved, Member Olson seconded, to recommend the proposed ordinance with office structures of four stories and no more than 60 feet in height. Carried 7-0. Chair Klausing suggested revisiting the issue if setback issues are identified in the future. Gc. Planning File 3174. A request by the City of Roseville to consider an amendment to Section 1016.26 of the Roseville City Code, specifically amending requirements regulating storm water management. The amendment is a requirement of the Metropolitan Council's approval of Roseville's Comprehensive Plan. Chair Klausing opened the hearing regarding the storm water management and practices. Thomas Paschke summarized the ordinance and Deb Bloom explained Best Management Practices and "NURP". Member Olson noted that the residential development area of five acres (not 20 acres - a typographic error) should be corrected. A general discussion ensued regarding mandatory vs permissive adoption and the relationship to the three watershed management agencies within the City. No comment from the public was offered. Chair Klausing closed the hearing. Motion. Member Mulder moved, Member Cunningham seconded, to recommend approval of the proposed ordinance as amended and set forth the second reading item for Council consideration on April 24, 2000. Carried 7-0. Commission decided to move to Item 7a for consideration at this point. 7. Presentations and Other Actions 7a. Planning File 3202. Sale of 2668 Lexington Avenue: Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Dennis Welsch introduced the proposal regarding the City sale of vacant residential property for uses consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation for the site. George Reiling wished to purchase the City property at 2668 Lexington Avenue to build a senior housing project. It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Chair Klausing asked what does the Planning Commission review consist of? City Attorney Joel Jamnik explained the statutory requirements. Motion. Member Klausing moved, Member Mulder seconded, to recommend approval of the proposed sale of 2668 Lexington Avenue to George Reiling, being consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.