pm_000510 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

David Carland, Vice President CSM, explained the proposal, noting that CSM also owns the adjacent Residence Inn. Veritas has pre-negotiated to reserve rooms. Marriott Courtyard is a first class hotel for business users. He explained the site plan and the shared spillover parking with adjacent Veritas Building 1. Elevations of the Hotel were described. Member Rhody explained that his firm does work for CSM's Consultant, RLK, and noted that his firm may run some copies. It is not a major financial issue. He has found that this relationship will not impair his judgment on the issue. The Planning Commission agreed with Member Rhody. Chair Klausing asked why the change in circumstances. Kent Carlson explained the original buildings on the south side were office showroom buildings. The change to Veritas has created a demand for a business class restaurant. The hotel site was first considered as an office site. Member Wilke asked about the added value generated in the community. Member Cunningham asked for Veritas plans - a total of four buildings in the Business Park. John Zavada, Ramada Inn General Manager, stated that the 40 jobs will be a break even, a loss at one hotel is a gain at another. He stated that the Roseville Visitor's Association (RVA) has figures for occupancy. In 1999 the revenue dropped 4% in Roseville. Why is there no restaurant in the Business Park? He suggested traffic has increased dramatically. There is more traffic at later hours; more disruption of the communities. He explained hotel operations within the City. Mr. Savada explained that the CSM multi-brand hotels sends customers out of the community. Mary Reed, Brenner Avenue, explained the history of approval for previous projects. The hotel will generate more traffic. Why one more hotel? There are other hotels in the area. Lynn Shurrer, North Wilder, asked if there was a variance needed for Veritas.(No variance necessary). The 619,000 s.t. was greater than the original plan. It gets more dense each time a proposal comes forth. Member Mulder asked if there was a plan (as per previous comments) to change/buy the car dealers along the west side of 1-35W? (no). Member Mulder said that PUD plans change with time. This change makes sense. It is not what was originally expected, but is a reasonable response. Member Wilke asked for details regarding traffic and stop light improvements. Chair Klausing stated that fiscal impacts were not an issue to be addressed. The community health, safety and welfare and consistency are important. Chair Klausing closed the hearing. Motion: Member Rhody moved, Member Mulder seconded, to recommend approval of the amendment to PUD #1177 for Centre Pointe Business Park in accordance with the findings and standards set forth in the project report dated May 10, 2000. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 Gg. Planning File 3189: A request by James Trapp for a Sketch Plan Review for the redevelopment of property located at 2211 County Road C-2. The proposal would create a 37,000 square foot multiple tenant structure. Thomas Paschke explained the sketch plan process and the reasons for the project planning at this time. Richard Fischer, architect representing owner James Trapp, explained the proposal for the site. The plan is to tear down metal buildings and replace with new buildings of 25-27,000 s.f.. The buildings will be decorative Fabcon tip-up panel construction. A showroom area for vans will be necessary. He explained that the site plan must change to move building area out from the NSP easements. Rice Creek Watershed District will review the site as well (4.2 acres). Member Mulder asked if there are any brownfields on the site (possibly two sites). Member Wilke asked for details on the original interim use permit (Boater's Marine Outlet).