pm_000913 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

There being no further comments, Chair Klausing closed the hearing. Motion: Member Klausing moved, second by Member Mulder, to recommend approval of the request of Dick Maser, 2916 Woodbridge Street, for a conditional use to permit construction of a 1,008 square foot detached accessory building (garage) adjacent to the north property line, based on the findings in Section 3 and conditions in Section 4 (with an amendment to Condition 4) of the project report dated September 13, 2000: Findings: 1. Mr. Maser proposes a 1008 square foot detached garage to replace his existing 22 foot by 26 foot (572 sq. ft.) detached garage and shed. The proposal requires a conditional use permit (CU P) as per City Code Section 1004.01A.12. 2. Section 1 013.01.D of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance lists the criteria reviewed when considering the issuance of a conditional use permit. The criteria are as follows: impact of parking; impact on parks, streets, and other public facilities; compatibility of site plan, internal traffic circulation, landscaping, and structures with contiguous properties; impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties; impact on the general public health, safety, and welfare; compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. Staff has reviewed the development proposal with regard to the criteria in Section 1 013.01.D of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance and concludes the proposal meets these criteria. Specifically, the proposed detached garage will not create additional traffic or the need for additional public facilities. With proper exterior building treatment, drainage, the building will not have an impact on surrounding property or values. There appears to be no impact on general health, safety, and public welfare. In addition, the project complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation as low density residential uses. Some of the adjacent property owners have contacted the City indicating their support for the CUP. 4. The proposed location of the detached garage in the northern rear yard is placed at a point adjacent to the neighboring (2926 Woodbridge Street) detached garage. This location provides the property with a greater front yard that opens-up the parcel to adjacent property owner view lines. 5. For purposes of rear yard accessory building coverage, the required rear yard is calculated by multiplying the width of the lot (100 feet) by the rear yard (30 feet) by the 40% allowance. In Mr. Maser's case he is allowed a rear yard accessory building coverage allowance of up to 1,200 square feet. 6. The parcel is approximately 18,295 square feet in size, allowing 5,489 square feet of impervious area. Mr. Maser's proposal calls for a total impervious area of 4,204 square feet. 7. The parcel contains numerous trees and large shrubs that will screen and break-up the detached accessory building from adjacent properties. 8. Conditions may be attached to the CU P that would mitigate the impact on adjacent properties including such items as increased setbacks from property lines, landscape screening, architectural color and design/materials details, drainage provisions, and limiting additional exterior storage. Conditions: 1. The existing principal structure and proposed detached accessory building with driveway and sidewalk area be limited to 5,489 square feet. 2. The proposed detached accessory building shall be a minimum of five feet from the north property line. 3. All roof drainage created by the new structure must be collected in gutters and channeled to the natural drainage way within the applicant's property (east and south). 4. The exterior of the building must be of similar color of the home. 5. Because of the size of the new structure (1,008 sq. ft.) no other accessory building or tool shed may be permitted on the property. 6. The maximum height (as defined in Section 1004.01) shall be 15 feet. 7. The existing detached accessory structure and shed must be removed from the site. 8. This conditional use permit expires 6 months after approval if a building permit has not been issued. (Section 1013.03) Ayes: 5 Nays: 1 (Member Olson) Motion passes. 7. Presentations and Other Actions None 8. Information, Reports and Other Business 8a. Progress report on zoning amendment to "front yard definitions" and fence setback permits. No discussion. 9. Adjournment. The meeting adjourned at 10:40 p.m. Return to Planning Commission