Laserfiche WebLink
<br />provide a verbal summary of the staff report dated November 8, 2000. <br /> <br />Karen Milton, 2939 Mildred, noted some choices may affect lake and life quality. Leave forest area on west side of lake. <br />Housing should be town homes (not high density on Lake). There is traffic concerns (5000-7000 vehicles) that should be <br />studied. She opposes retail uses in area because of existing retail - no big box retail. Preserve quality of life. <br /> <br />Member Mulder asked if she preferred existing hi-tech/flex west of the lake, similar to Centre Pointe (Yes). <br /> <br />Member Wilke asked about the traffic demand in the area. (To be studied in AUAR) <br /> <br />Member Mulder asked about vehicles and air quality. (To be studied in AUAR) <br /> <br />Chair Klausing asked how deregulation and redevelopment will affect trucking in the future. <br /> <br />Steve Miller, Old Dominian Freight, said trucking does want to remain. Deregulation had little to do with trucking in the <br />area - it was the economics in the industry. The 1980 deregulation added trucking - there is a need for more terminals. <br />New property for terminals is too far out from center city to improve or maintain "stem-time". Forced relocation would <br />greatly increase the cost of trucking. The current terminal was built in 1963. The value of the land tends to make moving <br />attractive. Bringing in 8000 new vehicles (from new employees) will be a big impact compared to existing trucking. <br /> <br />Pat Johnson, 2986 Mildred Drive, described Langton Lake park and shoreland zoning. Warehouses were built in 1974, <br />the developers along the west and south sides provided a dedication of 100 feet, to further protect the shoreland. <br /> <br />She noted that the 1988 Plan was adopted because the truckers would sell at higher prices, then relocate further north. <br />As market develops, Roseville had a plan in place to address future land uses. In 1988, the development plan was passed <br />and has slowly moved to completion since that date. She supported the Comprehensive Plan amendment with option #2 - <br />a good mix of uses that would serve the neighborhood well. <br /> <br />Member Mulder asked if other uses should be of concern. Ms. Johnson expressed concern about the hospital but traffic <br />will always be there. Housing has been in the plan in the past and should be considered again. Big box retail is very <br />difficult to support. <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson noted the City has a responsibility to continue redevelopment because of the new businesses that have <br />located there since 1990. She said health club or services and fitness is complementary to the trail, park and <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Don Tschida, 1888 County Road C-2, supports concept of business park and low density (town homes), owner-occupied <br />housing. He prefers option #2. The medical facility does not benefit the city; employees will not use Roseville housing. <br />High density housing is not complementary to the park. <br /> <br />Carol Erickson, 2925 Mildred Drive, supported option #2 and noted that the buildings in the area are deteriorating. The <br />new buildings are fine. Traffic is a problem, but is something we will live with. <br /> <br />John Komula, representative of St. Paul Properties in area 10 and 12, noted viable industries in area should remain as hi- <br />tech, which now includes 20 businesses with 800 employees; supported the option #2 hi-tech/hi flex uses. He submitted a <br />letter to the Commission dated November 8, 2000. <br /> <br />Amy Mammen, 2966 Mildred Drive, supported the amendment, either options #2 or #3, but opposed to big box retail. <br /> <br />Sean Regan, Premier Bank, whose family owns area 7 (2 trucking related sites), and have an option on area 6, the Hand <br />W Trucking site. He noted there is no land available for retail users in Roseville. He explained his property plans based <br />upon the 1988 Twin Lakes plan which designated the site as "Retail". Office is a high risk planned use in today's market. <br />He supports option #4 including retail uses; this process will have impacts on his property. Byerlys, the Tile Shop, the <br />Fireside Shop and other retailers are adjacent to the site. His sites are currently fully occupied with truck and bus services. <br />The retail users do not get TIF assistance. Retail should be one of the options. Retail has become a high quality finish. <br />Retail wages can be much higher than normally thought of by the public. He is concerned ultimately about the zoning on <br />this site. The city needs to understand each property owner's concerns so that all could collaborate. He welcomes further <br />discussions. <br /> <br />There being no further public comment offered, Chair Klausing closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Member Mulder asked for detail on Snelling access at the Parkway. He asked staff to review the Woodbury Medical <br />