pm_001213 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Member Mulder asked if there was a match up with the pool hall, theatres, assemblies, dance halls (no, it is zone specific) . Member Cunningham asked for clarification of proximity of bingo to a highway in B-1 zones. Member Olson asked for clarification on the operation of a bingo hall, and on where an amusement establishment may be located. Member Rhody asked how the issue would have been handled at Hamline Center with this new ordinance. (A license would still be required.) Chair Klausing asked for detail on the Roseville history of bingo in a club use (Knights of Columbus) as an incidental accessory use within a premise permit. Chair Klausing noted the Planning Commission does not review the license but asked what are the impacts that are reviewed. Section 303 has setback provisions - should bingo have similar requirements? Member Rhody asked in a SC district, could a bingo operation place a center into a 24- hour operation classification? (yes). Member Olson asked what was the 1500-foot setback meant to do or prevent? Rick Carlson, Pastor of Roseville covenant Church, stated that this ordinance might be a good approach. He recommended the proposed ordinance as a viable option but with some setback. Chair Klausing asked for clarification - should there be a "reasonable setback" from uses. Uses separated could include day care, schools, and other institutions. Chair Klausing closed the hearing. Member Mulder noted that this ordinance focuses the issue on the license in all zones except B-1 and B-1 B where a CUP would be required; clarification is needed on why 400 feet is used. Chair Klausing asked whether setback provisions are established for bingo because of moral aversion or to keep a segment of the population from being attracted to the site. Member Mulder asked if the City could deny a license because it is not appropriate to the neighborhood. Joel Jamnik explained it would be much more difficult. Motion 1: Member Mulder moved, second by Member Rhody, to recommend approval of the request by the City of Roseville to amend Sections 1004, 1005 and 1007 of the Roseville City Code. Chair Klausing asked that the Council look at the separation issue as per Section 303.04. Motion 2: Member Mulder moved, second by Member Rhody, to amend the motion by deleting Section 4, paragraph 7, of the proposed ordinance. Amendment to the original motion withdrawn. Motion 3: Member Mulder moved, second by Member Klausing, to add language to Section 4 "a Bingo Hall shall not be subject to the distance requirements in this Section". Motion carried 5-0. Motion 4: Member Mulder moved, second by Member Klausing to recommend approval of Motion 1, as amended by Motion 3, for the request by the City of Roseville to amend Sections 1004, 1005 and 1007 of the Roseville City Code. Ayes: 5