My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_001213
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2000
>
pm_001213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:35:57 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 8:04:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
12/13/2000
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Member Cunningham liked the enhanced residential look and feel. As a Planned Unit Development the application should <br />explain what types of business could be permitted. <br /> <br />Member Olson asked if types of tenants could be listed in the PUD. Hours of operation for offices should also be known. <br />No retail is allowed in a B-1 base zoning. <br /> <br />Chair Klausing noted the B-1 zone would be the underlying zone. No further comments. <br /> <br />b. Planning File 3281: A request by JL T Group Inc. for sketch plan review of a five story, 262,600 square foot office <br />addition and 1470 stall, five level parking deck for property located at 2700 Snelling Avenue (former NCR facility). <br /> <br />Dennis Welsch summarized the application. Kurt Williamson explained the need for expansion. Todd Young, KKE <br />Architects, explained the building addition scheme. Existing driveways would be used. Setbacks of 30 feet from the <br />property lines are questioned. Brick and glass facades are proposed. The building could be built in phases. When <br />complete the floor plates would average 50,000 square feet. The parking ratio of 4.5 stalls/1 000 square feet is proposed. <br />Ponding may be a challenge. <br /> <br />Member Mulder asked how parking ramps would integrate with building and existing ramp. How much impervious surface <br />is left on the site? <br /> <br />Member Rhody asked about impacts of building and parking ramps on residential areas to the east. (Two floors of ramp <br />could be underground, with three floors up to 30 feet, above grade). How is ponding done on top of building? <br /> <br />Member Rhody asked for details regarding the area of rooftop water storage. <br /> <br />Member Cunningham asked for current occupancy? (95%, 850 employees). <br /> <br />Member Cunningham asked for impact of traffic on the frontage road and asked whether additional work will be done on <br />this. An indirect source permit may be necessary. <br /> <br />Member Mulder asked the height of the proposed building (75 feet) and existing building (50 feet). <br /> <br />Member Rhody explained that this density may be of concern. <br /> <br />Ponding and impacts on neighbors to east are also a concern. <br /> <br />Chair Klausing expressed concern about height (3 stories is the maximum allowed) and ramp impacts. <br /> <br />Member Mulder expressed concern about the building height and indicated the ramp must be two stories below grade. A <br />70-foot building will create too much shade and found the height may have a negative impact. <br /> <br />Member Mulder asked if the building could be located along the west side of the site instead of east side. <br /> <br />Kurt Williamson said they had looked at adding the structure to the ramp but it was not feasible. <br /> <br />Member Olson asked what was non-conforming at this time (ponding, possibly setbacks, enclosures). <br /> <br />Member Cunningham asked if the ramp could be razed and new building placed on site. <br /> <br />There were no further comments. <br /> <br />7. Public Hearings <br /> <br />a. Planning File 3278: A request by the City of Roseville to consider a text amendment to the City Code, Title 10, Zoning, <br />authorizing the location of a bingo hall in the Business and Industrial Districts within the City. <br /> <br />Chair Klausing opened the hearing and requested the City Attorney Joel Jamnik to explain the proposed ordinance. The <br />ordinance proposed a bingo hall as a Conditional Use Permit in a B-1 and B-1 B (within 400 feet of a state of interstate <br />highway). Joel explained the reasoning on the 400-foot provision. Bingo would also be a permitted use in B-2, B-3, 1-1, 1-2 <br />and SC zones. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.