My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_010214
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2001
>
pm_010214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:35:58 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 8:04:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/14/2001
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />neighborhood. The dining area closes at 10:00 p.m.; only the drive-through is open from 10:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.. <br /> <br />Peter Anderson, 1105 California Avenue West, noted that he was present at the initial approval and continues to <br />oppose the expanded hours, particularly in the weeknights. Thomas Paschke explained pass-by traffic is existing <br />traffic. Mr. Anderson said the increased traffic would be "bar traffic". His block is elderly and young children. Mr. <br />Anderson said his property has become a trash dumping ground from Taco Bell, which will increase with expanded <br />hours. He suggested reduced hours of operation on weeknights but longer hours on weekends. He had no concern <br />regarding the proposed signage on the building. <br /> <br />Member Duncan said he was concerned with the number of objections (few) and the block club support or negative <br />comments. How many residents are opposed? <br /> <br />Member Cunningham asked Mr. Anderson if additional traffic was being added to California Avenue by Taco Bell <br />(no). <br /> <br />No further public comment was offered; Chair Rhody closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Motion #1: Member Rhody moved, second by Member Duncan, to recommend approval of the request by <br />Heritage Realty Management, Inc and Border Foods (PF2390) to amend Planned Unit Development #1199 <br />allowing an additional 20 square foot sign on the north facade at 1101 Larpenteur Avenue. <br /> <br />Ayes: 5, Rhody, Olson, Duncan, Cunningham, Mulder <br /> <br />Nays: 0 <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />This request will be forwarded to the Roseville City Council for action on March 12, 2001. <br /> <br />Member Duncan said staff comment #4.3 regarding hours should be more specific to measure impacts. <br /> <br />Member Mulder noted that the Commission had previously recommended only the Council review these <br />performance issues. (Mr. Erickson said he had no objection). <br /> <br />Member Cunningham noted that the Taco Bell drive-through vehicle impact on the neighborhood by headlights was <br />negligible. The hours should be left to the marked. <br /> <br />Member Cunningham was in favor of the motion. <br /> <br />Member Olson was in favor with yearly review. <br /> <br />Motion #2: Member Mulder moved, second by Member Rhody, to recommend approval of the increased hours of <br />operation from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. weekdays and weekends for the Taco Bell, 1101 Larpenteur Avenue, with an <br />annual (two year) review in December 2001 and 2002 by the City Council with appropriate action taken. <br /> <br />Ayes: 5, Rhody, Olson, Duncan, Cunningham, Mulder <br /> <br />Nays: 0 <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />This request will be forwarded to the Roseville City Council for action on March 12, 2001. <br /> <br />c. Planning File 3288: A request by Brad and Randi Lundell, 1828 Ryan Avenue for a variance to Section 1004.02D4 <br />of the Roseville City Code to allow the construction of a garage addition to encroach into the required setback <br />adjacent to a corner side yard property line. <br /> <br />Chairman John Rhody opened the public hearing and requested city planner Thomas Paschke to provide a verbal <br />summary of the project report dated February 14, 2001. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke explained the variance request, noting he had received only one communication, which was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.