Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Motion: Member Duncan moved, second by Member Olson, to recommend denial, without prejudice, of the request by <br />Bauer Homes for a Variance (Section 1004.02D4) because the application is premature and incomplete. <br /> <br />Member Cunningham asked if a new application and fee was required (Yes, because a new hearing and notice is <br />required). <br /> <br />Ayes: 6 <br /> <br />Nays: 0 <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />6. Continued Public Hearings <br /> <br />(a) Planning File 3329: A request by Kathleen Agness for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning (from R-1 to <br />B-1) to change the former Rymer Academy (allowed through a special use permit) to an office use. The property is <br />located at 2256 Lexington Avenue. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Jim Mulder opened the hearing and requested Dennis Welsch to provide a verbal summary of the project <br />report dated September 12, 2001. <br /> <br />Dennis Welsch Community Development Director explained that Kathleen Agness has requested a Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Business (B) and a Rezoning from Single Family Residence District <br />(R-1) to Limited Business District (B-1) and/or an Interim Use Permit (City Code Section1012.09) on the property located <br />at 2256 Lexington Ave. <br /> <br />He noted that the 20,271 s.t. (97.7'x 207.1') property located at 2256 Lexington Avenue was formerly the Rymer School of <br />Fine Arts Academy, a use that existed on the property for approximately 40 years (1960 to 2000). The building is <br />estimated to be 2,700 s.f. in size. The building is 75+ years old and was originally a single family residence (1925 to <br />1960). Parking spaces (16 to 20) exist behind the building where parking pavement has covered the majority of the rear <br />yard. <br /> <br />The buyer/seller assumed that a special use permit was issued to the Rymer Academy that could apply to Schorn Realty. <br />In 1960, when Rymer applied for the permit to operate in this building, the original application was for a rezoning to a B-1 <br />zone. The City Council and attorney at that time decided a more appropriate solution was a special use permit for the <br />music school only. In 1984, the City amended the R-1 code to allow private schools - such as a music academy - as a <br />permitted use in the R-1 zone. The City has no record of a special use permit for anything but the Rymer Music Academy. <br />A Music School (or any public or private school) continues to be permitted use in the current R-1 low-density residential <br />zoning district text; a business is not a permitted or conditional use. The City Code has no provision for office conditional <br />uses in an R-1 zone. At the August hearing, nearby property owners questioned if some type of special permit could be <br />issued to allow only a small office, but prohibit other business or commercial uses. The only possible permit for this single <br />use (with restrictive conditions) could be an Interim Use Permit, found in Section 1012.09 of the City Code. <br /> <br />Staff recommended denial of the request by Ms. Agness to change the Comprehensive Plan from LDR (Low Density <br />Residential) and B (Business) and recommends denial of a rezoning from R-1 to B-1 based on the findings in Section 4 <br />and 5 of this report (09/12/01). <br /> <br />Staff also recommended approval of an Interim Use Permit of which the applicant may seek renewal every five years (with <br />conditions, which are shown in the attached draft resolution). The staff recommends this because the site was previously <br />used for a music academy for 40 years. Even then, some supporters of the 1960 academy reported that the noise and <br />traffic was too intense an impact for a single family home use. The noise and traffic impacts of the academy were more <br />intense than those of the proposed residential real estate office. After 40 years, without substantial improvements and <br />removals, the building will not easily be reconverted to an owner occupied single family home. Given the current R-1 <br />zoning, it is more likely, economically, that the structure would be converted to a shared residential use by four unrelated <br />house renters who share expenses, each with one or two vehicles to be parked on the large paved pad in the rear of the <br />site. <br /> <br />Ms. Kathleen Agness stated she had concerns with the interim use permit because it was not permanent. She said "B- <br />1" (Business zoning) is the highest and best use for the site. She will look for group home uses, including a home with six <br />residents. The Department of Corrections is interested in this site. She listed possible residential occupants and compared <br />it to "B-1" zone. She is concerned that an interim use is too risky financially. Ms. Agness said the site was noisy in 1960 <br />and worse today. Traffic has and will increase. <br />