Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(B-6, Office Park Districts) to create a B-6 Mixed Use Business Park District. <br /> <br />Chair John Rhody opened the hearing and requested Community Development Director Dennis Welsch to provide a <br />verbal summary of the project report dated December 12, 2001. <br /> <br />Dennis Welsch provided review of the proposed amendment and discussed the history of the request. <br /> <br />In September of 2001, the City of Roseville established in its Comprehensive Plan a Business Park designation. The Twin <br />Lakes Master Plan was approved with that designation. On October 24, 2001, the Metropolitan Council approved the <br />designation of "Business Park" within the Twin Lakes Master Plan Amendment to the City of Roseville Comprehensive <br />Plan. The Commission formally reviewed this item on November 14,2001. <br /> <br />Since that date the Community Development Department has reviewed the Roseville Zoning Ordinance to determine <br />whether it is preferable to create a separate zoning district or revise the existing district. The Department concluded that <br />the current B-6, Office Park District could be amended with the new language consistent with a mixed-use business park. <br /> <br />A "Mixed Use Business Park District" is defined as a geographically identifiable area which contains a consistent <br />architectural mix of office, office-laboratory, office-showroom-warehousing, bio-technical, biomedical, high-tech software <br />and hardware production uses with support services such as limited retail, health, fitness, lodging and multifamily housing. <br /> <br />There being no public comment, Chair Rhody closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Rhody moved, seconded by Member Traynor, as amended by Member Olson, to recommend approval of <br />the proposed B-6 "Mixed Use Business Park District" as consistent with the purpose and intent of the comprehensive <br />Land Use Plan definition and designation, with the following modifications: <br /> <br />Section 1. Purpose. Page 1, line 8, "... .statement or similar study, evaluation, or review. The impacts...", and page <br />2, line 18, "C. Special Minimum Requirements: 2. Maximum Floor Area Ratio: ~Je FFl8)(iFFlt,lFFl fleer 8Fe8 F8tieR is <br />reEJt,lireEl." <br /> <br />Ayes: 5 <br /> <br />Nays: 0 <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />c. Planning File 3350: (Continued Hearing) Adoption of Annual (2001) Comprehensive Plan Revisions and declaring the <br />2002 Capital Improvement Program consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Chair John Rhody opened the hearing and requested staff to provide a verbal summary of the project report dated <br />December 12, 2001. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke explained that by January 2, 2002 all issues/new data will be available for Planning Commission and <br />public comment, and recommended this hearing be continued to the Planning Commission's meeting of January 2, 2002. <br /> <br />Chair Rhody closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Rhody moved, seconded by Member Duncan, to continue the hearing on the adoption of the annual <br />(2001) Comprehensive Plan revisions and declaring the 2002 Capital Improvement Program consistent with the <br />Comprehensive Plan to the Planning Commission's next regular meeting of January 2, 2002. <br /> <br />Ayes: 5 <br /> <br />Nays: 0 <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />9. Other Actions <br /> <br />a. Shoreland Regulations Report <br />