My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_020605
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2002
>
pm_020605
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:36:03 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 8:04:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/5/2002
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />additional programs. They have determined a need for four additional classrooms outside of the existing (limited) <br />classroom space within Advent Lutheran Church, and have proposed installing a 56-foot by 72-foot (two units - 4,032 sq. <br />ft.) modular classroom building on the south side of the school portion of the church. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke noted that bathroom capacity has not been determined at this time. <br /> <br />The Planning staff recommended approval with conditions. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke explained past Interim Use Permits. <br /> <br />Member Mulder asked for duration of the office interim use (three years). <br /> <br />Ann Hennessey, Family Academy Dean, noted the growth of the student enrollment to 180; 6th, 7th, 8th grade students <br />need more space; N.E. 916 will also need placement space for children with hearing problems. <br /> <br />The maximum student enrollment is 225 students. The Charter School leases space for the three years. Advent Lutheran <br />could expand their classroom space or the School will look for other space. <br /> <br />Member Cunningham asked what the viability of long-term leases with Advent Lutheran was. The School would stay if the <br />Church expanded. <br /> <br />Member Mulder questioned the children's needs to move into the Church for lavatories. The lavatories should be placed in <br />the interim buildings. <br /> <br />Member Cunningham asked if sheltered walkways could be used for egress to Church. <br /> <br />There were no public comments. Chair Duncan closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke noted the Church representatives supported the proposal. <br /> <br />Member Cunningham stated he was supportive but encouraged bathroom facilities within the building, by modifying <br />condition "I". <br /> <br />Chair Duncan asked for Interim Use Permit (lUP) to have consistent expiration dates. The first IUP should not be <br />extended. Member Cunningham said two years might create a problem. <br /> <br />Member Mulder noted that the first IUP coming due in two years is enough leverage to have the School and Church take <br />some permanent action. <br /> <br />Member Bakeman asked for buildings that have presentable exteriors. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke explained the Planning Commission and City Council have the ability to place conditions on timing for <br />the site. Each year the IUP will be reviewed and a report submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Duncan moved, seconded by Member Mulder, to recommend approval of an interim use permit <br />expiring September 2004 for Family Academy Charter School and Advent Lutheran Church (PF3392) to allow a <br />temporary 56-foot by 72-foot (4,032 sq.ft.) modular classroom south of the existing school, based on the findings <br />of Section 5, the conditions in Section 6 of the project report dated June 5, 2002, and with an expiration date of <br />June 30, 2005, with the condition "I" amended as per Member Cunningham, relative to requiring interior <br />bathrooms within the modular structure, including information on sanitary waste storage and pumping plans. <br /> <br />Member Mulder and Member Cunningham asked if the building would be sprinklered? (No) <br /> <br />Member Cunningham stated he was concerned about the composition of the sanitary tanks themselves. <br /> <br />Member Peper asked for sanitary capacity of current structure. (No answer available). <br /> <br />Vote on motion: <br /> <br />Ayes: 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.