My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_030709
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2003
>
pm_030709
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:36:11 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 8:04:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/9/2003
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Member Traynor reported on the tour and thanked the staff and HRA. Member Stone suggested this tour be done <br />as an annul event. Member Bakeman liked the meeting format with the HRA Board members, the Planning <br />Commission, elected officials and the staff. Member Peper suggested a second tour, perhaps focusing on <br />development issues. Staff will prepare a second tour for later in the year. <br /> <br />b. New Initiatives: Are these items ready for formal hearings? Commission should set schedules on: <br />Fee Structure: Update fees for various permits - discussion. <br /> <br />Member Bakeman asked that administrative fines be re-thought for "repeat offenders, with a geometrically <br />increasing fees". The City should review the fee structure each year and adapt to the current costs of service. <br />Dennis Welsch explained that many cities now have such an escalating fee schedule that covers the fee and <br />additional charges for city police, attorney, engineer, or consultants. <br /> <br />Planning Commission: Greeting and Meeting Description for Applicants: <br /> <br />Chair Duncan remarked that more detail for the applicants may be helpful in order to prepare them for the meeting <br />with the Commission. Members Stone and Traynor asked if there are other cities with such a document; how can <br />we help applicants understand the process and improve communications. A check list with details could be <br />created. Staff will continue to collect information and provide the Commission with a packet at a coming meeting. <br /> <br />c. Set August 2003 Meeting Location. <br />The Commission requested notice signs be again posted in the yards of the applicants describing the time and <br />date of the hearing. <br /> <br />d. Signs on applicants sites: Deb Bloom explained the new City Hall expansion construction and entry issues. <br /> <br />e. Twin Lakes Project review was discussed: <br />The applicant Roseville Properties will hold their own neighborhood meeting on July 22 or July 23rd. It is possible <br />that a public hearing with the Planning Commission could be scheduled for August 6, 2003. <br /> <br />8. Adjourn: The regular meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. <br /> <br />Return to Planning Commission <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.