pm_030806 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Member Bakeman stated a need for a maximum size of the structures and screening of the houses, which will also stop the view of the park. Chair Mulder asked for details of the landscape plan. Developer, staff and neighbors work on a landscape plan. Staff should be directed to work on such a plan. Member Stone stated the setback should be 30 feet, with a 20 foot setback between units. Thomas Paschke said the Planning Commission could specify wetland setbacks and sizes of units - not to exceed a maximum footprint size. Chair Mulder asked about outbuildings. Thomas Paschke noted that a PUD normally does not allow outbuildings as a condition of approval. Member Stone cautioned the maximum setback should be flexible. The City Code requires a 50 foot setback. Member Bakeman asked for clarification of section 5.12. Chair Mulder asked for clarification of the first living level and overall height. When does the lower level become a part of the house? Member Peper said he does not understand the maximum size of the unit. Member Bakeman explained that there will be a massing from the opposite side of the wetland. Bob Moser said the development is not specific because of the need for flexibility. The setbacks that are proposed limit flexibility; could vary between 1400 and 1800 s.f. To project will be sent to City Council on August 18, 2003. Thomas Paschke will mail notice as to when this will go to Council. Park Commission will review this proposal in September. The Planning staff recommended approval of the proposal. There was no public comment offered. Chairman Mulder closed the hearing. Motion: Member Bakeman moved, second by Member Peper, to recommend approval (approve w/modifications or deny) of the preliminary plat and Planned Unit Development "General Concept Plan", creating a 6 unit residential PUD development with an underlying zoning of R-2. The development will include 3 structures with 2 attached owner occupied units, each undivided common areas and common maintenance, as illustrated in the application (plan set), based on the findings and comments of Section 5 in the project report dated August 6, 2003 and with conditions recommended by the Commission as follows: Landscape Plan Setback east side 30 feet minimum, 20 feet between units, 50 feet from wetland No accessory structures Staff to review massing of each two unit combination and break up roof line mass. Work with neighbors on all plans. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. c. Planning File 3502: Request by Dan Stock, Press Gym, for a VARIANCE to Section 1009.04A2 (Residence District Signage) of the Roseville City Code to allow the installation of a second monument sign identifying the Press Gym in the front yard of property owned by Sunrise Assisted Living. Chairman Jim Mulder opened the hearing and requested community Development Director Dennis Welsch to provide a verbal summary of the staff written report dated August 6, 2003. Mr. Welsch explained the proposal. He advised Dan Stock, owner of the Press Gym and Sunrise Assisted Living, was seeking approval of a variance to Section 1 009.04A2 (Residence District Signage) and 1009.03M (Ground Signs) to allow the installation of a second monument sign in the front yard of the Sunrise facility, which sign identifies the Press Gym. The requested proposal is to install a 4 foot by 6 foot V-shaped sign (48 total square feet) in the front yard of the Sunrise Assisted Living parcel, to be located at or near the property line adjacent to Snelling Avenue on the northern portion of the site. Mr. Stock has submitted a proposal to install a 4 foot by 6 foot V-shaped sign (48 total square feet) in the front yard