pm_030806 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Motion: Member Peper moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to recommend approval of a 5 foot, 2 inch side yard variance to Section 1005.01 A2 (Side Yard Setback) of the Roseville City Code for Vicorp Restaurant Inc., to allow a 4 foot, 10 inch side yard setback for construction of a 5 foot by 15 foot (75 sq. ft.) uni-sex restroom in compliance with Minnesota State Accessibility Code at 1881 Highway 36 West based on the findings in Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated August 6, 2003. Ayes: 5 Nay: 0 Motion carried. h. Planning File 3508: Request by James and Marian Korf for a variance to Section 1 004.01AG (Maximum Total Surface Area) and 1004.01 E (Dwelling Dimensions - Front Yard Setback) of the Roseville City Code to allow the installation of a new porch on the front (south) and side (west) of their home at 1407 Burke Avenue W. Chairman Jim Mulder opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke to provide a verbal summary of the staff written report dated August 6, 2003. Mr. Paschke indicated that Marian and James Korf, 1047 Burke Avenue, were seeking approval of a variance to Section 1004.01 AG (Maximum Total Surface Area) and 1004.01 E (Exception) of the Roseville City Code to allow the construction of a porch on to the front (south) and side (west) of their home. Thomas Paschke advised that based on the information provided and the findings in Section 5 of the project report dated August 6, 2003, the Planning staff recommends approval of a 575 square foot (5%) variance to Section 1004.01 A6 and a 7 foot 6 inch variance to Section 1004.01 E of the Roseville City Code for Marian and James Korf to allow the construction of a front and side porch on to their home at 1047 Burke Avenue, subject to the following conditions: a. The parcel being limited to an impervious coverage maximum of 3,577 square feet or 35%. b. The porch addition being limited to the size indicated on the submitted plans, including being limited to a 7 foot 6 inch extension on the front (south) of the home and a 5 foot 4 inch extension one the side (west) on the home. c. Gutters and downspouts must be installed along the eves of the porch to direct runoff into the front and side yard of the parcel. d. The review and approval of a building permit must be consistent with the approved plans and variances. There were no comments from the applicant. Chair Mulder closed the hearing. Motion: Member Stone moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to recommend approval of a 575 square foot (5%) variance to Section 1004.01A6 (Maximum Total Surface Area) of the Roseville City Code, based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated August 6, 2003. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Motion: Member Stone moved, seconded by Member Peper, to recommend approval of a 7 foot, 6 inch, variance to Section 1004.01 E (Exception) of the Roseville City Code, based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated August 6, 2003. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. 7. Information, Reports & Other Business (Verbal Reports): a. Nathan Bouvet was introduced by City Planner Thomas Paschke. The Planning Commission welcomed Nathan. b. Chair Mulder asked if Twin Lakes developers would return with a new sketch plan. (The Commission did express a need for a status update in the fall). Thomas Paschke explained the staff will request the developer return, but not deal with minute details. 8. Adjourn: The regular meeting was adjourned at 10:20 p.m.