My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_030903
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2003
>
pm_030903
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:36:12 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 8:04:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/3/2003
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Scott Santanni, 1019 Sherren Street, has submitted a proposal to construct a detached accessory building on his <br />lot. The proposed structure, a 30 foot 6 inch by 33 foot (1,007 sq. ft.) storage building would be located just north of <br />the existing attached two-stall garage. The sum of the area of an attached garage and detached accessory building <br />cannot exceed the size of the house. In this case, the proposed 1,007 sq. ft. detached accessory building when <br />combined with the existing 440 sq. ft. attached garage, creates 1,447 sq. ft. of combined accessory building square <br />size, which size is 458 sq. ft. greater than the 898 sq. ft. home. <br /> <br />The Santanni home was constructed in 1951 and lies on a 28,072 square foot (87 feet by 323 feet) parcel. The <br />home has a foundation size of 989 sq. ft.; a rear yard allowance of 1 ,053 sq. ft.; and an impervious coverage <br />allowance of 8,422 sq. ft. <br /> <br />The existing conditions and the proposed accessory building fall well below the maximum impervious surface area <br />afforded the parcel. Like wise, the proposed detached accessory building is below the size afforded by the Code. <br />However, when combined, the attached garage (440 sq. ft.) and proposed detached accessory building (1,007 sq. <br />ft.) exceed the footprint size of the home (989 sq. ft.) by 458 sq. ft. <br /> <br />Section 1 004.01A5 reads: "Overall Area: The overall area of attached garage and <br />detached accessory building(s) shall not exceed the exterior dimensional footprint of the <br />principal structure, excluding any attached garage footprint." <br /> <br />Section 1004.01 A4 requires a conditional use permit for an accessory structure exceeding 864 square feet in size, <br />up to a maximum of 1 ,008 square feet, subject to meeting criteria. <br /> <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the proposal and explained that it is difficult to justify a departure from the <br />strict application of the City Code allowing the applicant to construct the proposed detached 1,007 sq. ft. detached <br />accessory building. However, there is justification for reduced sized detached accessory structure, one that is more <br />in keeping with a double stall structure than the triple stall size proposed. Specifically, a detached accessory <br />building 24 feet wide by 26 feet deep or 624 sq. ft in size would reduce the variance by 379 sq. ft., but more <br />importantly, would afford Mr. Santanni ample storage space for the items stated, and would be in keeping with the <br />structures in the neighborhood and no Conditional Use Permit would be required for a 624 square foot building. <br /> <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the development proposal with regard to the criteria in Section 1013.01.0 <br />(Conditional Use Permit) of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance and concluded the proposal meets these criteria. <br />Specifically, a detached accessory building is a permitted use in an R-1 District. The proposed detached garage <br />will not create additional traffic or the need for additional public facilities. With proper exterior building treatment, <br />drainage, and landscaping, the building will not have an impact on surrounding property or values. There appears <br />to be no impact on general health, safety, and public welfare. In addition, the project complies with the <br />Comprehensive Plan designation as low-density residential uses. <br /> <br />Mr. Paschke stated that the Community Development Staff recommends approval of a 75 square foot variance to <br />Section 1 004.01A5 of the Roseville City Code for Scott Santanni to allow the construction of a detached accessory <br />building in the rear yard at 1019 Sherren Street, subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />a. The detached accessory building being limited to a size of 24 feet by 26 feet or 624 square feet. <br />b. The parcel being limited to a maximum impervious coverage of 8,422 square feet or 30%. <br />c. The detached accessory building being limited to the storage of residential (not <br />commercial) equipment, material, seasonally used recreational vehicle or a seasonally driven vehicle or collectable. <br />d. Submittal of a scaled site plan indicating existing and proposed conditions consistent with the above variance <br />conditions. <br />e. Windows being placed on the east and west building wall to break-up the building wall. <br />1. Gutters installed along the eves of the detached accessory building and directed to the parcel's interior yard to <br />reduce impacts to the adjacent residential properties. <br />g. The review and approval of a building permit must be consistent with the approved plans and variance. <br /> <br />Chair Duncan asked what the 1 % story house upstairs square foot area of the house was (700 square feet for a <br />total of 1600 - 1700 square feet). <br /> <br />Member Mulder asked what happens if the building (home) changes size? (More accessory structure could be <br />added). <br /> <br />Chair Duncan asked for a definition of a standard garage. City Planner indicated that no true standard exists; <br />however general rule 24 feet by 26 feet is a good sized two stall garage. <br /> <br />Scott Santanni explained that his house has a footprint of 1 ,030 sq. ft., a breezeway of 108 sq. ft., for an overall <br />size of 1,138 sq. ft. He explained that a 700+ sq. ft. garage should be allowed based on the size of the house. <br />There is no visual impact to the neighbors and not visible from the sides or street and that the building will be the <br />same height as the existing garage. The main reason for this garage is storage and for a boat, trailer, snowmobile, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.