My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_040303
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
pm_040303
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:36:14 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 8:04:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/3/2004
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Joe Lolle, 1227 Oakcrest, expressed concern about traffic on Oakcrest. Could one unit be removed, and a roadway <br />be constructed to Hamline. Thomas Paschke explained that traffic increase will not be dramatic. Mr. Lolle asked if <br />Hamline could better absorb the traffic. Assistant Public Works Director Debra Bloom explained that access on <br />busy arterial streets makes them less safe. Access is better directly across from the Rose Pointe driveway or on <br />the MSA Oakcrest which has a capacity of 2,000. <br /> <br />Mr. Lolle asked the square footage of the units (1,700 first floors, 1,500 downstairs, a total of 3,000 + square feet). <br /> <br />David Becklin, 1357 Brooks Avenue, asked how many other similar developments have the developers done (12 <br />years of experience). How close is the foundation to the pipeline easement (52'). <br /> <br />Tim Grother, 2566 Hamline Avenue, asked for an explanation of comments from Comprehensive Plan regarding <br />easements to Willow Pond. He asked if there are regulations regarding owner vs. rental units. <br /> <br />Patrick Lone, 1335 Oakcrest, asked how eight units can be placed on this site. The valuation cannot be <br />understood, compared to existing homes. <br /> <br />Gordon Marten, 1312 Willow Circle, supports Oakcrest entrance because of traffic hazard on Hamline Avenue. <br />Why create a hazard? Exit on Oakcrest reduces starts and stops near pipeline. <br /> <br />Antoinette Long, 1335 Oakcrest, opposed the rezoning and submitted her opposition in the form of a neighborhood <br />petition. <br /> <br />Mrs. Linda Neilson noted she sent a letter to the Commission. The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as <br />LDR. Many people invested in this LDR neighborhood. She explained the pipeline easements. A tree was removed <br />by William Brothers Pipeline from her yard. She is concerned with headlights from the development. She also had <br />concerns with Rose Pointe lighting. This project acts as higher density development; the neighborhood is becoming <br />more dense. Traffic stacks from Hamline at County Road C. <br /> <br />Member Peper noted parking will not be permitted, but may allow turn arounds. Corner screening will not be <br />effective for Mrs. Neilson's higher property. There will be no increase in the value of her home from this project and <br />traffic. The size of the development and density is not appropriate. Hamline Center redevelopment will not <br />compliment her property. Traffic will add to non-safe conditions. <br /> <br />Dr. Yousset, 1319 Willow Circle, asked that grass be mowed properly within the easement and on lot. <br /> <br />Dave Becklin, 1357 Brooks Avenue, explained that he has water in his back yard. The new pavement and shingles <br />will add to the water in basements along Willow. The pipeline company clear cut the pine trees in his backyard. The <br />pipeline company will not allow trees. <br /> <br />Lorraine Macheck, (neighbor directly across Oakcrest at 1323 Oakcrest Avenue) expressed concern with lighting. <br />How will headlights be handled from the new driveway; she was concerned about the alignment of setbacks. <br /> <br />Todd Guerrero said the development interest is private, not public. He asked that the Planning Commission identify <br />the public interest. The Council members should not rubberstamp the project. Traffic does not favor approval of the <br />project. <br /> <br />Sandy McGiffin, 1379 Brooks, asked for details of the drainage plan. Debra Bloom explained drainage policy. She <br />asked, based on the drainage plan, what will happen to the storm water under the power lines? How many vehicles <br />will there be during peak hours ;( less than 8 per hour) adding more traffic creates problems. <br /> <br />Chair Mulder closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Member Ipsen asked for details in the Comprehensive Plan. Thomas Paschke explained the goals and policies. <br />Thomas Paschke explained the consistency. <br /> <br />Chair Mulder asked for conditions or amendments. <br /> <br />Member Peper explained the gaps in the proposal (porches, decks, screening, landscaping, and storm water) <br />should be completed and worked out with the neighbors. <br /> <br />Member Bakeman noted the landscaping can also be done on adjoining property to solve the screening. Mr. Stull <br />said he would have another meeting regarding landscaping and screening. <br /> <br />Member Bakeman asked for details on patios and decks. They should not be between the units. How large should <br />a patio or deck be? Chair Mulder said the integral porch is the only porch that should be accepted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.