My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_040303
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
pm_040303
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:36:14 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 8:04:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/3/2004
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Member Stone asked that the landscape plan be included. She asked what/where the City's 2,600 + future homes <br />to 2030 will be located. Thomas Paschke explained locations of such projects (medium density) and design <br />density. Chair Mulder noted he lives in such a development. <br /> <br />Member Peper asked about hours of operation on week days and week ends. What is the penalty for working <br />outside the hours permitted? (The final regulations are placed in the Planned Unit Development Agreement.) <br /> <br />Chair Mulder asked if screening could be placed on the outer end of the private road and on the pipeline easement. <br /> <br />Greg Stull, designed for Meadowview Homes, said the screening plan suggestions by the staff are acceptable. At <br />the neighborhood meeting, traffic was the primary concern. In terms of screening, he proposed more coniferous <br />pine trees. Site lighting will be addressed. <br /> <br />Member Stone asked why there is no association. Mr. Stull said there will be a homeowners' association. The <br />association will be directed by the builder until the project is completed. <br /> <br />Member Ipsen asked if Hamline Avenue access was considered, south of the townhomes along the easement. Mr. <br />Stull explained the reasons for Oakcrest entry because of pipelines. <br /> <br />Chair Mulder asked if the developer will work with neighbors on the landscape plan (yes). Mr. Stull also will work on <br />residential street lighting. <br /> <br />Member Peper asked how many were at the neighborhood meeting with the developer (estimated at 28-30 <br />residents). <br /> <br />Dr. Sadek Youssef, 1319 Willow Circle, asked if there is a hypothetical plan for five to six houses. Thomas Paschke <br />explained that four lots could be built without a road. However, with a cul-de-sac it could create a five-lot <br />subdivision. Dr. Youssef asked if storm water has been studied, the easement fills with water during heavy rains. <br />Thomas Paschke noted that the project must meet the water management requirements. Debra Bloom, Assistant <br />Public Works Director, explained that storm sewers will be needed and will improve the site, and will carry water to <br />Willow Pond. Dr. Youssef asked if the huge evergreen tree would be torn down. Thomas Paschke said the trees <br />along the periphery will be preserved if possible, but in the center of the site, most trees will be removed. Mr. Stull <br />said they will preserve as many trees as possible. <br /> <br />Mrs. Linda Neilson, 1349 Brooks Avenue W., asked if there are requirements for subdivision of the land. She asked <br />if the County must approve (only ifthere is an access on Hamline). She asked what the setbacks for porches or <br />decks would be from Oakcrest or Hamline. Thomas Paschke explained setbacks. Mrs. Neilson asked for an <br />explanation of the difference between a variance and PUD setbacks. <br /> <br />Mr. Stull explained that porches are incorporated into the structure and that porches/decks could exit off two sides <br />of the house, to a ten foot limit. <br /> <br />Mrs. Neilson asked if 26 feet is less than the Code of 30 feet, and would the 26% feet be a PUD requirement (yes). <br /> <br />Jim Dare, 2456 No. Hamline Avenue asked if a corner lot has two front yards or one. Thomas Paschke explained <br />the setback is the same 30 feet from the street front and side. He asked what the development will look like from <br />the Hamline and Oakcrest sides of the homes. <br /> <br />Chair Mulder asked for elevations of the rear of the home. Mr. Stull explained the rear elevations and garages. <br />Member Stone asked if hip roof lines will be added. What will the massing look like from the end walls? Mr. Stull <br />said he was open to either gable or hip roof. A gable is simpler to construct. <br /> <br />Todd Guerrero, 2474 Hamline Avenue, asked what authority the Planning Commission has over the project once <br />approved. Thomas Paschke explained the PUD binding agreement, noting that it runs with the document that is <br />recorded. Citizens can then notify the City staff of perceived violations or modifications. <br /> <br />Member Stone asked what procedures would be used to gain compliance while under construction. Thomas <br />Paschke explained performance bond and stop work tags. The City could withhold the Certificate of Occupancy or <br />withhold the next housing permit. <br /> <br />Mr. Guerrero asked, what is "life cycle housing? Thomas Paschke explained. Mr. Guerrero asked why $375,000 <br />per unit? Thomas Paschke explained City history with town homes values. Is the homeowner association regulated <br />by the City? (No). The City requires a completed, signed homeowner's association agreement be filed with the City. <br /> <br />Alan Deutsch, 1288 Oakcrest Avenue, asked how much closer than existing homes are the town homes to <br />Oakcrest. (a minimum of 3%feet, depending on the house being compared). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.