pm_040707 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

A. The proposed structure being placed at the required side yard setback, ten feet from the north property line, to allow for flexible parking on the south side of the building. B. The proposed mixed commercial structure being limited to a size not to exceed 9,000 sq. ft. C. Uses within the building being limited to those proposed by the applicant including office, automotive service, and automotive rental and leasing. D. The provision of 8 additional on-site parking (parallel) spaces along the southern boundary of the site. E. The automotive rental and leasing use being restricted to 12 on-site parking spaces, specifically 8 parallel spaces to be provided adjacent to the south property line (at the required 5 foot setback) and 4 spaces at the southwest corner of the western parking area.. F. Visitor/customer parking being located in the 11 on-site parking spaces along the south side of the building adjacent to the entry. G. Employee parking being restricted to the western parking area and those spaces north of the shop entrance. H. The trash enclosure being constructed of similar materials as that of the principal structure and placed on the site in a suitable location. Because of the weight of the dumpster when filled with discarded glass, its design and location must be screened but may eliminate the roof and be detached from the principal structure. I. The building being comprised of integral colored rock faced masonry units with banding accentuation, pre- finished metal trim, and metal or aluminum windows, as per the plans submitted on June 3, 2003. J. Review and approval of the utility, grading, and driveway accesses by the Roseville Public Works Department and storm water drainage plan for the site by the Rice Creek Watershed. K. The structure being limited to a maximum height of 3 stories. L. Signage and site lighting meeting the requirements of Section 1009 and 1010 of the Roseville City Code respectively. Member Bakeman asked for details of trash dumpster locations. Thomas Paschke explained how the staff is working with the owners to resolve the location. Member Pust asked for clarification regarding neighboring parcels (Burger King). Member Traynor asked if the structure will be two stories (yes, with a mezzanine and two-story office space. Three stories are allowed in a B-3 zone.) Chair Mulder asked if the building was three stories would there be adequate parking (unknown at this time, depends upon use of building). Member Bakeman asked if vehicles can be left outdoors overnight. (yes) Mr. Elison had no further comments. Liz Acker, Roselawn Avenue, asked if the owner has discussed this project with the home owner. (Home owner is selling the structure and lot to the applicant). There were no further comments. Chair Mulder asked what uses are allowed in a B-3 vs a B-4 zone. Thomas Paschke explained uses that are different. The Conditional Use Permit within the B-3 zone further restricts the site. Dan Boerigter noted the building is limited to a 9,000 square foot building. It would be difficult to add another story. A general discussion of parking needs ensued. Chair Mulder closed the hearing. Motion: Member Traynor moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to recommend approval of the Rezoning request by Rod Ellison, based on the findings in Section 5, specifically 5.11 through 5.14 of the project report dated July 7, 2004.