My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_041006
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
pm_041006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:36:16 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 8:04:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/6/2004
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1. Natural landscaping, habitat protection and vegetative screening <br />2. Water quality, quantity, and storage <br />3. Setbacks to protect slopes, wetlands, and shoreline (if applicable) <br />4. Subdivisions of land and availability of city utility services <br />5. Floor coverages, drainage, ponding and erosion prevention <br />6. Open space preservation techniques <br /> <br />Michael Noonan, Tim Whitten, Joe Samuel, Adam Arvidson presented details on the Twin Lakes Rottlund proposal. <br /> <br />Tim Whitten explained the overall master plan proposal. He explained the process of review including the <br />Stakeholder process. The new parkway has been designed as a continuous roadway through the site. The larger <br />retailers had been moved closer to County Road C and Cleveland. A focused "center" concept was redesigned. <br />With those changes, the Stakeholders were asked for feedback by the Master Developer. He explained the <br />housing elements on the site plan, with better, four-story housing nearest the center focus of the site. Young <br />professionals and seniors are the primary market. <br /> <br />Joe Samuel, Rottlund/RLK Engineer, explained the proposed right-of-way plan and road widths. He explained <br />round-abouts for Prior at the Parkway. <br /> <br />Member Doherty asked about the impact of pedestrian crossways on round-abouts. This requires new driving and <br />walking behavior. Deb Bloom explained there would be fewer left turn conflicts with a round-about, making the <br />access points safer. <br /> <br />Chair Traynor asked staff and consultants to prepare a report on round-abouts. <br /> <br />Joe Samuel explained storm water/surface water drainage systems throughout the site. Ponding will be required to <br />have infiltration in sandy soils. For water quality, the project will collect a two-year, 2 % inch rainfall. A series of <br />ponds will capture the water. Chair Traynor asked if treatment in the ponds will be clean and attractive. (A two cell <br />pond will be used to capture water in the first cell, then drain to a dry cell. The first cell will be used to capture <br />sediment and debris for later clean up.) Fountains can be used to aerate the ponds. <br /> <br />The drainage areas into the lakes are similar with 41 acres (existing) to 42 acres (proposed) draining to the lake, <br />but in a higher quality level. (Water quality should improve in Langton Lake). <br /> <br />Adam Arvidson, Landscape Architect, explained the design of green spaces and "green layer". Links to Langton <br />Lake will add more green space from the development. The green space of the park expands into the site. Mr. <br />Arvidson explained that storm water management is now done within an amenity (Heritage Park in Minneapolis). <br />Swales and vegetation will be used for infiltration, including in parking lots. He explained trail and sidewalk plans. <br /> <br />Chair Traynor asked if the Parks and Recreation Commission had any reaction (October 5th). Michael Noonan <br />explained responses are best described in the Commission meeting notes. Chair Traynor asked if there will be park <br />dedication. The Parks and Recreation Commission made no decision until more detail was available. General <br />discussion ensued. <br /> <br />Member Pust asked for details or support for the round-about as a "green layer". Adam Arvidson explained round- <br />abouts can signal as a transition to a new land use or park/open space. Member Pust asked for details of raised <br />parkway trails and sidewalks. Michael Noonan explained the proposed pedestrian ways. <br /> <br />Member Doherty asked how the pathways/sidewalks will be different than from "walking through a parking lot". <br />Green islands could be raised or lowered areas in parking lots with sidewalks. Examples will be provided at the <br />next meeting. <br /> <br />Chair Traynor asked what the "signature concept" of Twin Lakes would be - such as Arbor Lakes and Heart of the <br />City. What is the unique community benefit? Tim Whitten explained the unique opportunity to bring housing <br />together, closely with retail and office - a small town center adjacent to Langton Park. <br /> <br />Tim Whitten explained the housing will be denser, there will be mixes of uses; residences will be adjacent to shops <br />and restaurants such as (Westridge Market in Minnetonka). Small shops need bigger economic engines. <br /> <br />Michael Noonan added that a new neighborhood can tie existing and proposed development together. Heart of the <br />City is a similar example. Arbor Lakes feature is its main street. Centennial Lakes has a green corridor with a storm <br />water amenity among a mixed housing/retail area. <br /> <br />Member Ipsen asked for details of parking. Is all the parking necessary? (especially in the southwest corner). (Uses <br />a mix of uses and peak times to reduce pavement). <br /> <br />Member Pust asked why the Big Box cannot be located at the corner of "c" and Cleveland. (Do not want back side <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.