pm_041014 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Chair Mulder opened the hearing and requested the City Planner, Thomas Paschke, to summarize the request as per the project report dated October 6, 2004. There were no public comments. Member Bakeman expressed concern with the visual image (boring visually). Thomas Paschke explained that landscaping and screening will be required and that the drawings do not illustrate the detail of the building facade. Thomas Paschke explained that staff will work with the development manager. Chair Mulder recalled the Planning Commission's concern for long, straight roof lines. Can it be broken up either vertically and/or horizontally? No further comments. Chair Mulder closed the hearing. Motion: Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member Doherty, to recommend approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat, subdividing Outlot B into 17 town home lots and 1 common lot, subject to conditions "a through e" in Section 8.2 of the project report dated October 6, 2004. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Motion: Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member Doherty, to recommend approval of the Vacation of a Public Utility and Drainage Easement, located in the northern portion of Applewood Pointe of Arona 3rd Addition, specifically over Lot 1, Block 1 of said subdivision plat (as described on the preliminary plat). Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Motion: Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member Doherty, to recommend approval of the Final Development Plan as being consistent with Concept Development Plan approved by the City Council on June 16, 2003 and subject to the comments in Section 5.21 to 5.26 and the conditions indicated in Section 7 of the project report dated October 6, 2004. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. c. Planning File 3595: Request by the Rottlund Company for an Amendment to the Twin Lakes Master Plan, Preliminary Plat, Rezoning and General Concept Planned Unit Development Plan for Phase I of the Twin Lake Redevelopment Area, to allow an 80 acre redevelopment including office, commercial and residential uses. Chair Mulder opened the continued hearing. He explained the process for the hearing. The answers to questions from October 6th were addressed first. Dennis Welsch explained the park dedication and review by the Park Commission to take place in November and/or December. Thomas Paschke explained the setbacks from parks (no different than other property setbacks) and specific setbacks within a B-6 zoning districts. He reviewed R-3 and R-3A zoning district setback requirements. He also discussed R-6 (Townhome) zoning setbacks. Chair Mulder asked if the Planning Commission could recommend other setbacks by using PUD requirements (yes). Thomas Paschke explained the PUD agreement and control. He explained the Shoreland District requirements and the Twin Lakes shoreland management area of 300 feet. The minimum required structure setback is 75 feet from the ordinary high water level (OHWL). Structures within the shoreland management district must be 30 feet from the front setback property line in residential zones. Member Pust asked for an explanation of the R-3 and B-6 dimensions. Chair Mulder explained that the underlying zone is B-6, in which an office building could be built.