My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002-09-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2002
>
2002-09-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 2:55:45 PM
Creation date
6/14/2005 12:19:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/26/2002
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />& <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />Residential Solid Waste and Recycling Citizen Advisory Committee Report <br />Executive Summary <br />May 2002 <br /> <br /> <br />M' Eind' <br />llJor mgs <br /> <br />o Since the 1991 report there have been <br />many developments in the garbage and recy- <br />cling industries. Those changes include: <br /> <br />llii The number of Roseville residents <br />recycling and the amount they recycle <br />have stayed about the same since 1992 <br /> <br />llii Every Minnesotan is making more <br />garbage (just over a ton a year) despite <br />efforts at waste reduction, reuse and <br />recycling <br /> <br />I!i Garbage haulers are no longer <br />required to take our trash to a facility <br />that processes it into fuel for electricity <br />plants <br /> <br />I!i More of our garbage is being sent to <br />out of state landfills <br /> <br />llii Consolidations in the garbage <br />hauling industry resulting in fewer <br />haulers serving Roseville residents <br /> <br />o Residents surveyed are pleased with their <br />garbage service. Sixty-three percent rated it <br />excellent and 33% rated it good. Seventy-nine <br />percent said the rates seem fair for the service <br />provided; 16% said the rates were too high for <br />the service provided. <br /> <br />o Residents surveyed said they are con- <br />cerned about where their garbage goes and <br />would prefer garbage haulers take trash to a <br />resource recovery facility instead of a landfill. <br /> <br /> <br />Garbage being processed at a <br />Resource Recove,y Facility. <br /> <br />o Residents surveyed said the most impor- <br />tant part of a garbage collection system would <br />be keeping it low cost. <br /> <br />o Among the improvements in the recycling <br />program residents would like are: to accept <br />more materials and to improve the bin system <br />by either making them bigger, covered or <br />wheeled, or to provide more bins. <br /> <br />o Roseville is not meeting goals set by the <br />City Council to reduce waste and increase <br />recycling. <br /> <br />o Roseville is not meeting the State's hierar- <br />chy that calls for waste reduction and reuse, <br />recycling, composting, using resource recovery <br />and avoiding using landfills to dispose of our <br />trash. <br /> <br />o Only about a third of Roseville apartment, <br />condo and townhome residents can recycle <br />where they live. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.